Showing posts with label Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Maserati recalls Levante to address engine software bug




Maserati recalls Levante to address engine software bug

by Justin King
The fleet will receive a software update to prevent such behavior.


Read more: http://www.leftlanenews.com/maserati-recalls-levante-to-address-engine-software-bug-95104.html#ixzz4dNfII2bt












Tuesday, May 17, 2016

2015-'16 Dodge Dart Recalled for Engine Control Module Safety Software Issue




2015-'16 Dodge Dart Recalled for Engine Control Module Safety Software Issue


WASHINGTON — Fiat-Chrysler is recalling 1,232 2015-'16 Dodge Dart compact sedans equipped with the 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine and a manual transmission because of an engine control module safety software issue, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
"In the affected vehicles, the powertrain control module that monitors the engine torque output may be missing a backup layer of software," NHTSA said in its recall summary. "Without a backup layer of software, the control module may fail to prevent an un-commanded torque event, increasing the risk of a crash."
Simply put, the concern is that the cars may experience unintended acceleration.
There are no injuries, accidents or complaints linked to the recall, Fiat-Chrysler said in a filing with federal safety regulators.
Fiat-Chrysler spokesman Eric Mayne told Edmunds there are three layers of safety software in the affected cars and that two of them remain functional.
A stop-sale order is in effect on the affected vehicles.
The affected 2016 Dart cars were built from July 25, 2015 to December 16, 2015. The affected 2015 Dart cars were brought in for dealer service between September 15, 2015 and January 12, 2016.
Dodge dealers will update the engine control module software. The recall is expected to begin within 60 days. Owners can contact Fiat-Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403.
Edmunds says: Owners should wait for their official recall notice and then schedule a service appointment with their dealer. But if you have an immediate concern, it's best to contact your dealer now.




FCA RECALLS DODGE DART TO PREVENT 'UNINTENDED TORQUE EVENT'




FCA RECALLS DODGE DART TO PREVENT 'UNINTENDED TORQUE EVENT'


By Justin King

Tuesday, Mar 8th, 2016

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has issued a recall for a small batch of 2016 Dodge Dart sedans equipped with a 2.0-liter engine and manual transmission.

Approximately 1,200 units may have left the factory with improper software for the powertrain control module (PCM). The programming lacks redundant protections to protect against certain unintended engine behavior.

"Without a backup layer of software, the control module may fail to prevent an un-commanded torque event, increasing the risk of a crash," the recall documents note.

FCA suggests the software was created with several layers of programming, including provisions designed to detect engine control malfunctions and validate calculations. The software was 'desensitized' to enable engine calibration development, consistent with standard development procedures.

"If the level-two diagnostic calibrations are desensitized, there is a risk of not diagnosing certain module failure modes that would inhibit the software's ability to determine when the engine is producing more torque than what the driver is currently requesting," the recall chronology notes.

The desensitized test software appears to have mistakenly made its way to the factory floor with the developer mode enabled, allowing production cars to leave the assembly line without the safety provisions activated.

FCA is not aware of any accidents or injuries associated with the issue. Service technicians will simply install an ECM software update to restore proper function.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/fca-recalls-dodge-dart-to-prevent-unintended-torque-event-91184.html#



Saturday, March 5, 2016

Auto advocacy group calls for expanded probe into Jeep fuel tank safety, Toyota Air Bag Recalls






Auto advocacy group calls for expanded probe into Jeep fuel tank safety

Jeep Cherokees on car lot.

Jeep Cherokees on car lot.
March 3, 2016


Friday, August 7, 2015

Automakers Are Companies and Don’t Care About You






By  on August 6, 2015


Just like children who pledged allegiance to the flag before they started their school day, a number of grown adults are brand faithfuls who pledged their hard-earned dollars to a cause they believed is theirs to fight. For whatever reason, they are still steadfast in their belief that their brand is the best, their truck is better than all others and their car is the most reliable piece of transportation since God invented feet.

Yet, if there’s one thing that the last week, last month, last year, or even the last decade has taught us it’s that companies, specifically automakers, do not care about us. Not one bit.
Allow me to explain.

A piece published yesterday by Bloomberg called out Fiat Chrysler Automobiles on its failure to declare a defect in its highly embedded uConnect system found in 1.4 million cars and trucks to the NHTSA. While the defect itself, detailed by Wired late last month, thankfully wasn’t exploited between the time FCA first identified the issue and when they reported it (only after the Wired article went public), the situation is just one of many where a corporation chooses a financially advantageous route over that of the safety of its customers.

And FCA isn’t the only one.

Just this week, Ford was fingered for not putting reinforcing metal bars on regular and Fiat Chrysler Automobiless — models that wouldn’t normally be tested by the IIHS — that are a primary component in Ford’s best-selling pickup truck taking home a “Good” crash-test rating. The IIHS only requests automakers provide their volume seller for testing. In the F-150’s case, the crew cab model is the best seller, the only cab configuration fitted with these particular reinforcement bars.



To say Ford went out of its way to game the IIHS crash test might be a leap too far, but to say Ford’s cost analysis of adding a part weighed against the possibility of a lawsuit when someone is seriously injured or killed in an accident is not far fetched. After all, if a person in a crash doesn’t even know their vehicle is missing something, how could they even think of suing?
Yet, these recent antics are, by far, not the worst safety-related shenanigans to hit our industry in recent years. Honestly, neither is the ignition switch debacle still being handled by GM.
No, the worst one I can remember — at least over the last few years — included GM and a little rental car agency called Enterprise.
Back in 2009, Enterprise purchased some 66,000 Impalas from General Motors without side airbags — the same side airbags that were standard equipment if you bought the car yourself from the showroom floor. Enterprise saved an estimated $11.5 million USD ($175 on each car) with that one change and General Motors was more than willing to oblige as they took a nice, big bite out of the fleet business pie. That move in itself isn’t noteworthy, but what the rental car company did with many of those Impalas after they reached their rental life spans is: They sold those airbag-less Impalas to unsuspecting customers advertised with equipment lists stating the cars did, in fact, have side airbags.
From CBS News:
“There’s definitely a glitch in the system,” Enterprise’s vice president for corporate communications told The Star after the paper asked about the Web postings. “We’ll make it right with our customers. … None of this is intentional.”
What did Enterprise do in the end? For the vehicles that eventually ended up as privately owned vehicles, the rental car company offered to buy them back for $750 more than the Kelley Blue Book price at the time. According to Enterprise, only 745 vehicles ended up in private hands. Doing some incredibly conservative math means Enterprise was still ahead by roughly $10 million.
If you ever wanted an example of a company weighing cost vs. customer safety, well, there it is.
Just like Enterprise and GM back in 2009, Ford and FCA see these problems as being non-issues … until they’re caught red handed.
FCA has recalled the 1.4 million affected cars — against their will, I might add — and will need to mail out patches or have customers visit local dealers. Remember, this is all happening as FCA looks at a record-setting $105 million infraction ticket for its historical recall performance, or lack thereof.
Ford has flooded the blogosphere today with news that the F-150 will now come with a sport button. Yes, that’s right, a fucking sport button. Try Googling “Ford F-150″ today and it’s as if Crashgate never happened.
So, next time to pledge your donation to the My Favorite Brand club, remember this: You might care about them, but they only care about one thing from you — and it isn’t your life.




http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2015/08/automakers-companies-dont-care/



The article above raises important issues about NHTSA's failures to protect consumers and owners and innocent victims. 





The revolving door has cast doubts on integrity. 


Even in the article above, the CORPORATE media is silenced to the Oligarchs..... 




This man, Koua Fong Lee went to prison when his out-of-control TOYOTA killed others. [see details on right]  



After a unanimous jury verdict, TOYOTA still couldn't 'DO THE RIGHT THING' and address a known defect. 


PLEASE! 


Let's stop ignoring TOYOTA in this conversation! 




Please review some of the articles below: 



+ 37,900 complaints ignored by Toyota



Evidence Toyota Knew of Defective Break[sic] Override System Allowed in Florida Man’s Catastrophic Vehicular Injury Trial


PALM BEACH GARDENS, Fla., Aug 05, 2014 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- A Florida man who sustained catastrophic injuries that rendered him a quadriplegic when his 2002 Toyota Camry unexpectedly went out of control can present evidence in court that Toyota Motor Corporation and other defendants knew that the break [sic] override and Electronic Throttle Control System (ETCS) were defective, resulting in unintended accelerations that have caused numerous deaths and injuries, a Florida Circuit Court ruled on Monday.

Toyota had received more than 37,900 complaints

 concerning the ETCS, which have been installed in 

Toyota-brand vehicles sold in the United States since 

1998.



NHTSA ignored 4,150 COMPLAINTS?



....thousands of complaints about power steering problems involving 2004 to 2007 Saturn Ions. 

Records we obtained from federal safety regulators show there have been 4,150 complaints about the vehicle's electric power steering system since 2004. Drivers criticized about "a sudden loss of steering power" that makes the "wheel difficult to turn." Many complaints said it happened "without warning."

The defect is blamed for 16 crashes and two injuries.





TOYOTA'S CORPORATE PLAYBOOK....Just continue the LIES!