Showing posts with label Sen. Ed Markey [D-MA]. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen. Ed Markey [D-MA]. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2016

Consumer groups criticize deal on auto recalls



The exploding TAKATA airbag scandal highlights the failure of the auto industry and NHTSA to protect consumers.  







Consumer groups criticize deal on auto recalls

BOSTON — Consumer advocates are blasting an agreement between regulators and used-car dealerships over auto recall disclosures, saying the deal endangers public safety.
Last week the Federal Trade Commission reached agreements with CarMax, the largest U.S. used-car dealer with more than 140 locations, including one in Danvers; Atlanta-based Asbury Automotive Group Inc.; and West-Herr Automotive Group in New York.
Under proposed consent orders, the dealers cannot claim that used vehicles are safe unless recall repairs have been made or open recalls are disclosed to buyers. They also must notify customers that cars bought as far back as 2013 may be subject to recalls.
The settlement did not impose fines or sanctions on the dealers.
The commission also reached agreements in similar cases with General Motors Co. and two other retailers, Jim Koons Management in the mid-Atlantic and Lithia Motors Inc. in Oregon.
In a statement, the Federal Trade Commission said some in the industry “touted how rigorously they inspect their used cars yet failed to adequately disclose that some of the cars were subject to un-repaired safety recalls.”
Consumer advocates say the deal is a giveaway to the used-car industry because it allows companies to disclose that cars “may” be subject to recalls without actually repairing them.
“The bottom-line here is that the result will be more consumers buying unsafe cars, putting the lives of not just themselves but everyone who shares the roadways in danger,” said Deirdre Cummings, legislative director at Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group.
“Consumers rightly have the expectation that when shopping at any car dealership they will be sold a safe car, and at the very least, they certainly would not expect that any car for sale would still be under a safety recall,” she said.
Flawed system
But some in the used-car business say the recall system is flawed, and rules such as last week’s consent order unfairly keep them from selling cars that are safe to drive.
Not all recalls issued by manufacturers and the government are safety-related, said Robert O’Koniewski, executive vice president of the Massachusetts State Automobile Dealers Association.
“It could be a page in the owner’s manual that needs to be changed or something wrong with the cup holders in a vehicle console,” he said.
Federal law prohibits auto dealers from selling new cars that are under recall, he said, but there are no such requirements for used vehicles.
In Massachusetts, the state’s “lemon law” requires dealers to disclose recalls on used cars — as well as any other information that could affect the sale, such as a dent that needs repairing — but it doesn’t require them to fix the problems.
National consumer groups say they plan to sue the government to block last week’s agreement. Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, a Sacramento, California-based advocacy group, called the deal “tragic” and “reckless.”
U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, who with other lawmakers has pushed for stricter limits on the industry, said it “makes it easier for dangerous cars to remain on the road.”
“Instead of ensuring safe cars for consumers, the FTC is ensuring safe harbor for used car dealers who provide false and deceptive assurances,” Markey said in a statement.
CarMax COO Cliff Wood said his company is an industry leader in transparency over recalls but will alter its sales and advertising language to comply with the agreement and keep consumers informed.
“We share vehicle-specific, open-recall information in store and online to ensure our customers know about open recalls prior to purchase,” Wood said in a statement. “We will continue to make enhancements to our comprehensive recall disclosure program.”
CarMax said all of its used cars “meet or exceed state safety inspection requirements,” but noted that recalls must be “repaired at a manufacturer-authorized facility.”
“The recall system is based on the manufacturer’s relationship with its dealers and registered vehicle owners, and not with independent used auto retailers,” the company said. “Among other things, this means that manufacturers have not authorized CarMax to complete recall repairs.”
Last year, MassPIRG and other groups released a report claiming that more than 17 percent of vehicles sold at CarMax’s North Attleboro dealership were subject to a federal safety recall that had not been repaired. Several vehicles had faulty transmissions that could allow the vehicle to roll away and injure people exiting the car or bystanders, according to MassPIRG.
AG intervention?
Advocates are looking to Attorney General Maura Healey to intervene by enforcing a state law that prohibits dealers from selling unsafe used cars and using deceptive sales practices.
Emily Snyder, a spokeswoman for Healey, said the office would be concerned if retailers fail to make repairs or alert customers about known recalls or other safety-related issues.
Sean Kane, president of Safety Research and Strategies Inc. in Rehoboth, said increasing numbers of recalls and deceptive sales practices confuse consumers.
Last week’s ruling, he said, “will only add” to the confusion.
“There’s a staggering number of recalls out there,” he said, noting estimates that suggest 1 in 5 vehicles are subject to a recall.
One major recall, for example, involves Takata-made airbags, some of which have exploded when deployed.
A November 2014 recall of the driver- and passenger-side airbags affects 14 automakers, 22 brands and more than 100 million vehicles worldwide, in what regulators say is the largest, most complex auto safety recall in U.S. history.
O’Koniewski said auto manufacturers are not able to keep up with the demand for parts to make repairs — including the Takata airbags.
“The shortage of parts is a huge problem,” he said. “Dealers are being forced to sit on new vehicles until the parts become available.”
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which oversees vehicle recalls, offers car-buyers and owners a search tool to check for recalls at www.safercar.gov. Most dealerships can also provide a CarFax report on used vehicles that will show if it’s subject to a recall.
Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for The Salem News and its sister newspapers and websites. Email him atcwade@cnhi.com.


Thursday, August 27, 2015

NHTSA: Always an excuse not to do its job! + 37,900 complaints ignored by Toyota





Senators urge NHTSA to speed early warning reforms



David Shepardson, Detroit News Washington Bureau

August 27, 2015


Washington — Two U.S. senators want the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to expand early warning reporting requirements for automakers in the wake of the agency's findings that several automakers have not complied with the rules.

Sens. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., noted that as part of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV record setting $105 million civil penalty for failing to properly carry out two dozens recalls it must provide the agency "with comprehensive reporting on each death or injury incident that is reportable to the agency."

The senators said "these steps are a substantial improvement over previous handling of safety recalls and reflect the direction the senators are calling on NHTSA to move in, but the lawmakers want NHTSA to go further by making such information public and applicable to all automakers, not just the one."

“The longer NHTSA waits to issue new requirements that automakers automatically submit all early warning documents related to potentially fatal defects and that NHTSA make this information available to the public one a user-friendly website, the higher the chance that the next fatal defect goes undetected,” the senators wrote to NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind. “It is time to recall our defective early warning reporting system and issue new rules to detect fatal defects.”

NHTSA spokesman Gordon Trowbridge declined to comment and referred questions to Rosekind's Senate testimony in June.

In June, the Transportation Department's Office of Inspector General said NHTSA must reform how automakers submit early warning data. NHTSA specifies 24 broad codes for categorizing early warning reporting data. But NHTSA says "an average vehicle may have over 15,000 components. Without detailed guidance, decisions regarding key aspects of early warning reporting data are left to the manufacturers’ discretion—resulting in inconsistent reporting and data that (NHTSA) and vehicle safety advocates consider to be of little use."

NHTSA: Always an excuse not to do its job! 



NHTSA said it plans to toughen early warning reporting rules by next June — unless it is required to write legally binding regulations, which could take longer,

The audit found that NHTSA's efforts for verifying that manufacturers submit complete and accurate early warning reporting data are lacking. NHTSA "does not follow standard statistical practices when analyzing early warning reporting data, such as establishing a base case for what statistical test results would look like in the absence of safety defects," the audit found. NHTSA doesn't ensure it is getting accurate information and the audit found generally relies on the "honor" system.

NHTSA has the authority to inspect manufacturers’ records for compliance with early warning reporting, but it has never used the authority. In one case, NHTSA knew a major recreational vehicle manufacturer was not complying but did not take action for nearly a decade.

Many of the audits 17 recommendations called for reforms, including developing "a method for assessing and improving the quality of early warning reporting data" and requiring automakers to develop procedures for complying with early warning reporting requirements; and require NHTSA to review these procedures at times.

NHTSA has vowed to comply with all of the recommendations by next year.

The senators introduced legislation earlier this year — the Early Warning Reporting System Improvement Act — that would require automobile and parts manufacturers to submit accident reports or other document that first alerted them to a fatality involving their vehicle or equipment to NHTSA’s Early Warning Reporting database. NHTSA would then required to automatically make those documents public unless they are exempted from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

In January, NHTSA fined Honda Motor Co. $70 million for failing to disclose more than 1,700 reports of deaths, injuries and other "early warning" over more than a decade — then the largest auto safety fine in U.S. history.

The Japanese automaker initially admitted in November it violated two sections of a 2000 federal law that requires automakers to disclose reports to NHTSA. The company has agreed to pay the maximum $35 million fine allowable under each section as part of a consent agreement for failing to turn over different types of reports.

"We're talking about 11 years — 11 years of information we did not have — and it is egregious," Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in January. He said it didn't matter why Honda failed to follow the law. "Good intentions don't help the automaker," Foxx said, saying NHTSA is taking a "very aggressive posture."

Foxx said NHTSA has asked all automakers to audit their early warning reporting systems to make sure they are in compliance with the reporting law. "We have to continue to do better on our end but we sure want to send a signal very clearly to the industry that they have an end to this responsibility to take on as well," Foxx said.

In November, Honda disclosed that since 2003 it had made a series of significant mistakes in failing to report more than 1,700 incidents. It came under harsh criticism in Congress. Honda blamed a faulty computer program and inadvertent data entry and coding errors as reasons for failing to report problems, but the automaker also said it didn't do enough to fix the problem. After reports first surfaced that Honda hadn't complied with reporting requirements, it commissioned an audit in September to determine how often and why it failed to comply with requirements.


+ 37,900 complaints ignored by Toyota



The reporting requirements are designed to help the auto safety agency spot safety trends earlier. They are required under the TREAD Act, which Congress approved after 270 reported deaths in Ford SUVs were linked to faulty Firestone tires.


http://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/2015/08/27/senators-urge-nhtsa-speed-early-warning-reforms/32482797/


Sunday, November 30, 2014

What will the Auto Industry tolerate?



At the bottom of the article below is a list of reasonable proposals that would strengthen NHTSA and work to protect consumers from the egregious conduct witnessed recently, whether it's TOYOTA'S FAILURE TO CORRECT SUDDEN UNINTENDED ACCELERATION, GM's ignition switch failures, TAKATA EXPLODING AIRBAGS.

Will the Do-Nothing Congress pass anything sensible?

Will the Auto Industry tolerate reasonable oversight?



Is NHTSA nominee up to the task?

Rosekind first must prove himself to Congress


Mark Rosekind faces a confirmation hearing with lawmakers who have demanded reforms.


By Ryan Beene

Automotive NewsNovember 30, 2014 - 12:01 am ET

WASHINGTON -- As an expert on human fatigue, Mark Rosekind is well-suited to steer the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration toward the era of autonomous driving and connected-car technologies.

But in the near term, Rosekind will have to prove to members of Congress that he is up to the task of revitalizing an agency beset by lapses exposed in the General Motors ignition switch and Takata airbag scandals.

Rosekind will need to address "how to restore the public's trust in America's auto safety watchdog ... the need to implement the cultural change that's needed at the agency" and how it can keep up with the fast-changing auto industry, said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who heads the Senate Commerce Committee's consumer-protection panel.

Rosekind, who was appointed last month to head NHTSA, faces a Senate confirmation process that begins Wednesday and will put him face to face with several lawmakers who have been harshly critical of the agency and demanded reform. NHTSA has been without a Senate-confirmed administrator since January, when David Strickland stepped down and left his deputy, David Friedman, to serve as NHTSA's public face.


McCaskill: How to restore trust


The senators who will pass judgment on Rosekind have proposed several bills that would boost NHTSA's funding and enforcement powers, and they are likely to demand a commensurate level of responsiveness and accountability on the part of the regulator.

A lack of agency resources has been a recurring theme of congressional hearings into the GM and Takata recalls. NHTSA allocates just $10 million a year to its roughly 50 staffers who investigate defects in automobiles, buses, commercial vehicles, heavy-duty trucks and child car seats. By comparison, GM alone hired 35 safety investigators this year to beef up its defect investigation department, on top of the staff it already had, CEO Mary Barra told a U.S. House committee in June.

"NHTSA and Dr. Rosekind will face serious challenges and must do a better job discerning danger in cases like those involving GM ignition switches and Takata airbags, which imperiled drivers long after NHTSA had reason to act," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said in a statement. "At NHTSA, regulatory capture has created a failure to ask tough questions and has needlessly put lives at risk," he added, referring to the close relationship between the agency and the industry it regulates.
Since 2010, Rosekind has been a member of the National Transportation Safety Board, which investigates major transportation accidents. He was a NASA official in the 1990s, where he led a program to evaluate and prevent the effects of pilot fatigue, and he founded a fatigue-management firm after leaving the agency.

At NHTSA, Rosekind must overcome his limited experience with the auto industry and with running a large organization.

"Given the GM ignition switch and now Takata, I would have expected someone with more of a hands-on experience in vehicle safety," Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, told Reuters.

But some of NHTSA's outspoken critics were pleased with Rose-kind's nomination. Joan Claybrook, NHTSA's administrator under President Jimmy Carter, called Rosekind "an excellent choice."

"He understands regulation and law enforcement, both of which are critical as the leader of NHTSA," she said. "And he recognizes that regulators are not necessarily popular no matter what they do."
On the docket
 
Lawmakers have introduced several bills this year to improve compliance with and enforcement of federal auto safety laws.
Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2014*
Sponsor: Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.
Requires more automaker disclosures about fatal accidents and greater public access to safety reports, increases NHTSA funding for vehicle safety programs, boosts maximum agency fine to $200 million
Early Warning Reporting System Improvement Act
Sponsor: Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass.
Requires more automaker disclosures about fatal accidents and greater public access to safety reports, requires NHTSA to upgrade its online databases and provide public notice of all defect investigations
Motor Vehicle and Highway Safety Enhancement Act
Sponsor: Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
Doubles funding for NHTSA's vehicle safety operations over 6 years, raises or eliminates caps on NHTSA fines for violations, gives federal prosecutors more freedom to pursue criminal charges against safety-law violators
Whistleblower bill
Sponsor: Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.
Provides cash incentives to encourage industry employees to alert officials about faulty products
Hide No Harm Act
Sponsor: Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn.
Makes it a crime, punishable by fines and prison time, for an executive to knowingly conceal corporate actions that pose risk of death or serious injury

*Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., introduced a similar bill in the Senate.
 
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

TOYOTA LEXUS's 2d owner finds trouble, too




Car’s 2d owner finds trouble, too

Safety agency to revisit ’03 complaint about Lexus

By Erin Ailworth
Globe Staff


Not long after buying his used Lexus in 2003, Mark Pinnock discovered that the luxury sedan’s motor sometimes raced on its own, twice causing fender-benders. A mechanic friend told him it was a quirk of its powerful eight-cylinder engine.

Related

Timeline: Toyota recalls

Timeline: Toyota recalls

Follow the key dates of the company's recent quality struggles.
Product recalls

Total recall

Want to stay safe? Follow the latest product recalls here.
What Pinnock didn’t know was that the car, manufactured by Toyota Motor Corp., had a checkered history — it had prompted the first of what would become a series of federal investigations into mysterious acceleration in Toyota-made cars.
 
The car’s previous owner, a retiree from Braintree named Peter Boddaert, had complained in 2003 to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about three episodes of spontaneous acceleration, including one that caused him to rear-end a van. He grew too scared to drive the car, and traded it in.
 
Federal investigators looked into Boddaert’s complaint, but did not go so far as to examine the car, ultimately dismissing the case.
 
Now, they have new interest in that aging Lexus.

Following the recent recalls of roughly 8.5 million Toyota vehicles to replace floor mats and repair gas pedals, national safety officials “will be contacting the current owners of Mr. Boddaert’s car to gather more information,’’ NHTSA spokeswoman Karen Aldana wrote in an e-mail to the Globe.
Aldana said that, as the agency investigates Toyota’s current issues, it will examine specific cars whose owners reported problems with bursts of speed.
 
The new interest in the case comes after Pinnock, the current owner, told the Globe he, too, has had his share of troubles with the car, even though he remains fond of the luxury vehicle.
 
The Globe verified that Pinnock’s Lexus LS400 is Boddaert’s old car through its vehicle identification number, using documents filed with Boddaert’s complaints to the NHTSA, Registry of Motor Vehicle records, and vehicle history reports. These documents show the Lexus was
manufactured and shipped to a Massachusetts dealer in March 1999, leased in New Hampshire, then purchased by Boddaert. In 2003, Pinnock bought it from McGee Cars in Hanover.
 
He first spotted the silver sedan while flipping through an auto shopper’s guide at the supermarket where he works nights, stocking shelves. Its immaculate, gray leather interior and a smooth test drive persuaded him to buy the car.
 
Pinnock soon discovered that the car’s engine revved often, sometimes accompanied by a burst of speed. His family teased him about it frequently.
 
“Why is the car so powerful?’’ his wife wondered.
 
“Dad, why is your car so fast?’’ his son asked.

“Why is your car always taking off?’’ his cousin queried.

“My engine is powerful,’’ the 39-year-old from Mattapan would answer time and again. “My engine is powerful.’’

Still, to be safe, he advised his wife and son to be ready to brake at any time when driving the car.

The precaution wasn’t always successful. At least twice, the car has been in fender-benders that Pinnock now questions.
 
One of the accidents, he said, occurred several years ago, when he parked at a gas station minimart to make a quick purchase. When he tried to ease the car from its spot, Pinnock said, it “took off’’ and hit the front end of a Mercedes-Benz, damaging that car’s grill.
 
Though Pinnock doesn’t remember the exact date of the accident, there is a report from the Boston Police Department that describes a similar incident in July 2005. Pinnock’s car was seen “backing into the front end of the victim’s M/V [motor vehicle]’’ — a brown 1997 Mercedes — at Norfolk and Morton streets in Mattapan, according to the report. There is an Exxon Mobil gas station at that intersection.


 
A second accident occurred, Pinnock said, as he was coming home from a soccer game at a park near his house. The car accelerated, he said, and rolled over a bicycle in the road. Insurance records from 2008 verify the “single vehicle collision with object.’’
 
Now that he knows more about his car’s previous life, Pinnock says he is worried about driving it and plans to ask a Lexus dealer to inspect the vehicle. If they can assure him the car is without fault, he’ll keep it.

“I still love the car,’’ he said last week, “but the problem is, I don’t want to carry my kids in there now, knowing this car is dangerous. It’s kind of scary.’’



 
In the past decade, at least 3,306 Toyota and Lexus drivers nationwide — including 176 in Massachusetts — have reported instances of sudden acceleration, according to the latest numbers from Safety Research & Strategies Inc., a Rehoboth firm that studies safety issues for attorneys and plaintiffs in civil complaints, government agencies, and other clients. Several dozen deaths also have been attributed to alleged acceleration-related accidents, according to data from Safety Research.
 
The recent recalls have prompted Congress to scrutinize the way the NHTSA and Toyota have handled reports of unintended acceleration in cars and trucks from the world’s largest automaker.
 
“It shouldn’t take both a media frenzy and a congressional hearing to get grave automotive problems taken seriously,’’ US Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Malden, said in an e-mailed statement. During a hearing last month, Markey questioned US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood about the way the traffic safety agency handled Boddaert’s case.
 
“I will continue to do all that I can to ensure that the causes of all incidents of unexplained sudden acceleration are identified and remedied, that any legislative remedies needed to prevent this from happening again are taken and that all affected vehicles are properly fixed,’’ Markey said.
 
Peter Boddaert, the original owner of the car, died last year at age 88. His son, Jack, said he’s hoping the scrutiny that Toyota is now under will lead to some sort of resolution for his family
“I think it would be very nice,’’ said Jack Boddaert, “if Lexus were to come back to us and say, ‘We are sorry, is there something we can do?’ ’’





http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2010/03/12/2d_owner_of_lexus_finds_trouble_too/?page=full


Sunday, November 9, 2014

Another GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD!




Betsy Benjaminson has written extensively about the CORRUPTION and WIDESPREAD BRIBERY in the AUTO INDUSTRY [in the US, we call it CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS - they got their money's worth and consumers lost! ]:


Senator Blumenthal: Secret settlements play important role in allowing lethal defects to "fester"




ADDITIONAL POSTS HERE:

Beware of Toyota. Their next victim may be YOU...

Toyota Owners Unite for Resolution Online

Senators seek criminal probe of air bag maker


  • Three senators are calling on the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation of the air bag maker Takata after former employees reported that the Japanese supplier had carried out tests on air bags over a decade ago and found signs of defects, yet did not seek the involvement of federal safety regulators.


  • By Hiroko Tabuchi
    The New York Times
    Posted Nov. 8, 2014 @ 7:41 am




    Three senators are calling on the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation of the air bag maker Takata after former employees reported that the Japanese supplier had carried out tests on air bags over a decade ago and found signs of defects, yet did not seek the involvement of federal safety regulators.

    “These allegations are credible and shocking — plainly warranting a prompt and aggressive criminal probe,” Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, both Democrats, said in a statement, responding to an article in The New York Times on Friday that reported on the employees’ disclosure.

    Four deaths and more than 30 injuries have been linked to the defect, including the death last month of Hien Tran, 51. Law enforcement officers in Florida said she died after her air bag erupted violently in her 2001 Honda Accord.


     



    Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, also called for a criminal inquiry. She said in a statement that if the accusations were true, Takata needed “to be held fully accountable, not just with financial penalties, but also with criminal charges.”

    The accusations involve air bags that can rupture when they deploy in an accident, sending shrapnel into the car’s cabin and injuring the driver or passengers, instead of protecting them. Eleven automakers have recalled more than 14 million cars worldwide over the defect, including 11 million cars in the United States.

    The former Takata employees say they took part in the testing of air bags retrieved from scrapyards in 2004, after an air bag ruptured in a Honda Accord that year, injuring the car’s driver. Of the air bags retrieved, two of the air bag inflaters cracked during the tests, a condition that can lead to rupture.

    But instead of alerting federal safety regulators to the possible danger, Takata executives discounted the results and ordered the lab technicians to delete the testing data from their computers and dispose of the air bag inflaters, they said.

    Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the latest allegations warranted a closer investigation into what Takata, and the automakers that it supplies, knew and when.

    “As the recalls continue and the faulty air bags are replaced, we also need answers about when the danger was discovered and whether it was concealed from regulators, or not adequately understood once the regulators became aware,” Upton said.

    Capitol Hill has also increased pressure on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to order automakers to expand recent air bag recalls, some of which have been limited to regions with high humidity because Takata says moisture could play a role in the defect. But in the face of continued uncertainty over the cause of the ruptures, lawmakers and auto safety advocates have called for nationwide recalls.



    http://www.capecodtimes.com/article/20141108/BIZ/141109649/101017/BIZ