Showing posts with label Toyota settlement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toyota settlement. Show all posts

Monday, January 9, 2017

F.B.I. Arrests Volkswagen Executive on Conspiracy Charges in Emissions Scandal




F.B.I. Arrests Volkswagen Executive on Conspiracy Charges in Emissions Scandal



ADAM GOLDMAN and HIROKO TABUCHI

JAN. 9, 2017

The executive, Oliver Schmidt, led the automaker’s regulatory compliance office in the United States from 2014 to March 2015.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has arrested a Volkswagen executive who faces charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States, two people with knowledge of the arrest said on Sunday, marking an escalation of the criminal investigation into the automaker’s diesel emissions cheating scandal.

Oliver Schmidt, who led Volkswagen’s regulatory compliance office in the United States from 2014 to March 2015, was arrested on Saturday by investigators in Florida and is expected to be arraigned on Monday in Detroit, said the two people, a law enforcement official and someone familiar with the case.

After a study by West Virginia University first raised questions over Volkswagen’s diesel motors in early 2014, Mr. Schmidt played a central role in trying to convince regulators that excess emissions were caused by technical problems rather than by deliberate cheating. Much of the data presented to regulators was fabricated, officials of the California Air Resources Board have said.

Mr. Schmidt continued to represent Volkswagen after the company admitted in September that cars were programmed to dupe regulators. He appeared before a committee of the British Parliament in January, telling legislators that Volkswagen’s behavior was not illegal in Europe.

Lawyers representing Mr. Schmidt did not respond to requests for comment late Sunday. Officials at the Justice Department also declined to comment, as did an F.B.I. spokesman in Detroit.

In a statement, Jeannine Ginivan, a spokeswoman for Volkswagen, said that the automaker “continues to cooperate with the Department of Justice” but that “it would not be appropriate to comment on any ongoing investigations or to discuss personnel matters.”

Lawsuits filed against Volkswagen by the New York and Massachusetts state attorneys general accused Mr. Schmidt of playing an important role in the carmaker’s efforts to conceal its emissions cheating from United States regulators.

Starting in late 2014, Mr. Schmidt and other Volkswagen officials repeatedly cited false technical explanations for the high emissions levels, the state attorneys general said. In 2015, Mr. Schmidt acknowledged the existence of a so-called defeat device that allowed Volkswagen cars to cheat emissions tests.

Volkswagen eventually said that it had fitted 11 million diesel cars worldwide with illegal software that made the vehicles capable of defeating pollution tests.

The software enabled the cars to sense when they were being tested for emissions and turn on pollution-control systems to curb emissions at the cost of engine performance. But those controls were not fully deployed on the road, where cars spewed nitrogen oxide at up to 40 times the levels allowed under the Clean Air Act.

James Liang, a former Volkswagen engineer who worked for the company in California, pleaded guilty in September to charges that included conspiracy to defraud the federal government and violating the Clean Air Act. But Mr. Schmidt’s arrest brings the investigation into the executive ranks.

The arrest came as Volkswagen and the Justice Department neared a deal to pay more than $2 billion to resolve the criminal investigation into the emissions cheating. The company or one of its corporate entities is expected to plead guilty as part of the deal.

The settlement could come as early as next week, barring any last-minute hiccups, according to people with knowledge of the negotiations.

The German automaker has been eager to put the Justice Department investigation behind it before President-elect Donald J. Trump is sworn in on Jan. 20.

American prosecutors had traveled to Germany in recent months to interview Volkswagen executives, according to German prosecutors.

The criminal case against Volkswagen, and the potential guilty plea, set it apart from other recent auto industry investigations. In settlements with General Motors and Toyota over their handling of safety defects, for example, the companies agreed to pay large fines, but did not plead guilty.

Prosecutors are also mulling criminal charges against Takata, the Japanese manufacturer under criminal investigation for its defective airbags.

Volkswagen has already agreed to pay up to nearly $16 billion to resolve civil claims in what has become one of the largest consumer class-action settlements ever in the United States, involving half a million cars.

Under the settlement, most car owners have the option of either selling their vehicles back to Volkswagen, or getting them fixed, provided the automaker could propose a fix that satisfied regulators.

The scandal has affected many Volkswagen and Audi models, including the Audi A3 and Volkswagen Beetle, Golf, Jetta and Passat diesel cars.

Ben Protess and Jack Ewing contributed reporting.


A version of this article appears in print on January 9, 2017, on Page A13 of the New York edition with the headline: F.B.I. Arrests Volkswagen Executive on Conspiracy Charges in Emissions Cheating Scandal. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/09/business/volkswagen-diesel-emissions-investigation-settlement.html?_r=1






Saturday, November 12, 2016

Toyota To Pay $3.4B To Settle Rusty Truck Frame Action





Before you cheer loudly, TOYOTA has been producing vehicles with this problem for many years. 



How many lives were jeopardized? 



How many owners were forced to JUNK their TOYOTA trucks before this was resolved? 




The TOYOTA WAY is Dilly Dally Delay & Stall! 












Toyota To Pay $3.4B To Settle Rusty Truck Frame Action

Law360, New York (November 10, 2016, 12:50 PM EST) -- Toyota Motor Co. on Wednesday agreed to pay approximately $3.4 billion to compensate owners of certain truck models with frames that are prone to rust corrosion and perforation in order to settle a proposed class action lawsuit in California federal court.

The owners of certain Tacoma, Tundra and Sequoia trucks asked U.S. District Judge Fernando M. Olguin to preliminarily approve the deal, which provides inspections for the approximately 1.5 million vehicles possibly affected by the defect, as well as the replacement of frames for an estimated...


http://www.law360.com/articles/861439/toyota-to-pay-3-4b-to-settle-rusty-truck-frame-action



Friday, July 31, 2015

Toyota settlement check was returned when I tried to deposit it. I was dinged $25 in returned check fee. What are my rights?







Toyota settlement check was returned when I tried to deposit it. I was dinged $25 in returned check fee. What are my rights?

I am an American who is currently abroad doing my PhD research. My family told me a couple months ago that I received a check from a Toyota settlement case (small amount of money). I emailed the contact athttp://www.toyotaelsettlement.com/ about possibly having them re-issue the check and either have them send it to me abroad OR to have them re-issue the check with a later expiration date than August 2015 (as I planned to return to the USA in September for 1 month so might be able to deposit the check at that time). Someone responded to my email a few days later who said re-issue of checks can take 1-3 months and on a rolling basis so there was no guarantee I'd get the re-issued check during my short visit back to the USA. Mailing it to me abroad was also problematic as I was using the embassy address so mail takes much longer (up to 4-6 weeks) to get here.
The check was issued by Bank of the West and it expires August 17, 2015. I finally contacted my bank a couple weeks ago with the dilemma. They said my family can mail the check to the bank for me and write "For deposit only" on the back. Great! I asked my family to do just that.
My bank deposited the check... and then a week later took away the money and charged me $25 in returned check fee. I was told that the bank account was closed! I just emailed the Toyota settlement team about what the hell happened. Hope to hear back soon, but want to know what are my rights? Can I get them to reimbursement the returned check fee as well?
Note: http://www.toyotaelsettlement.com/ does mention re-issuing checks with a March void date. My check had an August expiration date so I don't think they re-issued me a new check. I think my parents would have informed me if I received a new check from them in the mail. However, maybe this is a possibility and they did not update their website... who knows? Just emailed them and will wait. Wish I could call, but currently on vacation in another country as well and access to phones is difficult for me.
What are my rights? Would the resettlement team be responsible for reimbursing my $25 in returned check fee charged by my bank? I am just upset that this whole thing happened to me.
TL;DR: Tried to deposit a Toyota settlement check a couple months after receiving it, but before it's expiration date in August. My bank told me the check's bank account is now closed. My bank took away the check amount + $25 in returned check fee. Just emailed them, but can I get them to pay me back the $25 in returned check fee too?



http://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/3f9j8v/toyota_settlement_check_was_returned_when_i_tried/


Saturday, July 4, 2015

Toyota Access Program Class Action Settlement - Notice of Settlement Approval






Toyota Access Program Class Action Settlement - Notice of Settlement Approval


WATERLOO, ONJuly 4, 2015 /CNW/ - Crawford & Co., Ltd. as Claims Administrator announces that the settlement of all claims related to the Toyota Access Program class action in British Columbia has been approved by the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Additional information is available at www.BCToyotaAccessSettlement.ca.
SOURCE Crawford Class Action Services

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toyota-access-program-class-action-settlement---notice-of-settlement-approval-511631871.html












Toyota Access Program Class Action
Background to Settlement

A class action lawsuit was initiated in British Columbia alleging that Toyota Canada, Inc. engaged in anti competitive conduct through implementation of the “Access Program”. The lawsuit was certified as a class action.

Toyota denies that it has violated any law, denies that it engaged in any and all wrongdoing, and denies that the Access Program was anticompetitive. The Court has not made any finding as to the truth or merits of the claims or defences asserted by either side.  The allegations made by the plaintiffs have not been proven in court.

Without any admission of liability or wrongdoing, a Settlement Agreement has been reached. If you would like to download or view a copy of the Settlement Agreement click here.

Who is a class member?

All Canadian residents who purchased or leased a Toyota vehicle from an Authorized Toyota Dealership in British Columbia between June 12, 2002 and June 30, 2004 are class members.

What are my options?

OPTIONS ON LINK

http://bctoyotaaccesssettlement.ca/





Friday, January 16, 2015

Serious Q regarding the Toyota unintended acceleration settlement.







I recently got a check for 30 bucks because I own a Toyota that happens to be in the class action settlement.

The check states "By my (our) signature(s) on the back of this check, I (we) hereby agree to the terms of the Release as stated in Section VI of the Settlement Agreement."

This section has some very broad legal language that basically releases Toyota forever from any known and unknown events "connected with, and/or in any way involving the Actions, the Subject Vehicles, any and all claims involving the ETCS, any and all claims of unintended acceleration in any manner that are, or could have been, defined, alleged or described in the Economic Loss Master Consolidated Complaint, {...}, the TAMCC, the Actions or any amendments of the Actions, including, but not limited to, the design, manufacturing, advertising, testing, marketing, functionality, servicing, sale, lease or resale of the Subject Vehicles."

(Full agreement here: https://www.toyotaelsettlement.com/pdf/SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS.pdf )

There is a provision that does not release them from property damage or wrongful death suits, but they are still exempt from paying for any lawyer fees win or lose.

Now, I do believe these vehicles have this issue (although there were a lot of bullshit claims), based on this research:

http://www.edn.com/design/automotive/4423428/Toyota-s-killer-firmware--Bad-design-and-its-consequences

This seems like a very broad release to sign for only 30 dollars.

Knowing all these facts, would you sign it?




http://f2bbs.com/thread/15934




Serious Q regarding the Toyota unintended acceleration settlement.
Posted 1/15/2015 9:10 pm
http://f2bbs.com/thread/15934
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Case No. 8:10ML2151 JVS (FMOx)
https://www.toyotaelsettlement.com/pdf/SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT EXHIBITS.pdf




Wednesday, November 5, 2014

TOYOTA SOFTWARE: ....reeking with problems....






Gastkommentar Jack Ganssle

Expensive Software


Der Autor: Jack Ganssle ist ein international anerkannter Spezialist für Embedded-Systeme sowie gefragter Autor und Referent. Auf dem ESE Kongress 2014 hält er die TecKeynote am 2. November.

Der Autor: Jack Ganssle ist ein international anerkannter Spezialist für Embedded-Systeme sowie gefragter Autor und Referent. Auf dem ESE Kongress 2014 hält er die TecKeynote am 2. November.(Foto: J. Ganssle)
 
One wonders why we as an industry continue to flail around with poor practices that are ultimately expensive and even deadly, when there is a body of knowledge that is provably effective.

As everyone knows by now, Toyota has agreed to a $1.2 billion fine [1] to settle a criminal case over unintended acceleration. A jury in Oklahoma found that, in one case at least, the culprit was the firmware. This payout is on top of another $1B settlement for the same problem [2].




Bottom line: poor firmware has cost the company staggering amounts of cash. Testimony shows [3] that the firmware wasn’t just suffering from a bug; instead it was reeking with problems. One has to wonder what the engineers were thinking.



Everyone in this industry faces twin pressures: fast and cheap. Deliver now. Cut engineering costs. I have no insight into how many person-hours went into the Toyota code, nor do I know their delivery schedule. But let’s look at that most recent $1.2B payout. How does that compare to the engineering effort?


The NASA report [4] talks about a code base of “more than 280,000 lines” of code. Mike Barr tells me there were “over a million lines of C source code”. For argument’s sake, let’s figure on a million.

The most expensive code ever written is that of the Space Shuttle, which ran about $1000/LOC (201 Principles of Software Development, Alan M. Davis, 1995). With just the most recent settlement, Toyota’s code cost them over $1200 per line – without accounting for any engineering effort. The difference is that the Shuttle’s code is the best ever written, averaging about one bug per 400KLOC, and Toyota’s has been intensely litigated.



I am not suggesting that Shuttle development practices should be anyone’s goal. Perhaps a better benchmark is avionics. It’s largely believed that no one has been killed by defective firmware in commercial aircraft, yet that code controls pretty much everything. Sure, the pilots can take over, but modern planes are fly-by-wire. The pilot flies a computer. What does it cost to develop the fabulous software that mediates billions of passenger-miles per day in the air?

Commercial avionics is done to a standard called DO-178B (supplanted recently by DO-178C). Level E applies to software that won’t impact operations in any significant way. Level A is for code that can lead to the loss of the aircraft. How much does it cost to write code to level A?

Who knows? Data is sparse and proprietary. However, most pundits figure it’s about twice the cost of typical commercial firmware. Others (“DO-178B Costs Versus Benefits” by Vance Hilderman), in this case based on data from some 150 avionics programs, claim code written to level A is 65% more expensive than that to level E. That figure includes both the engineering effort and the certification process.

Note that level C is roughly equivalent to Capability Maturity Model level 3, which is generally considered the entry point to disciplined software engineering. Level A (in the B version of the standard) has 66 objectives that must be met, while there are none at E.

If one skips the certification effort – which is huge - and just writes level A code, some studies (e.g., “Safety Critical Software and Development Productivity” by O. Benediktsson – though this paper looks at IEC 61508 rather than DO-178B) show that with the use of highly-disciplined processes there is no extra cost to producing the best possible software. Use an ad hoc approach and there’s a 70% hit.

Let’s be pessimistic and assume the very best avionics costs twice that of typical commercial firmware. My data pegs the latter at $20 to $40 per line of code, from initial specification to shipping.

Doubling the high end puts the cost at $80/LOC, or 15 times cheaper than Toyota’s most recent payout. Add in their other settlements, legal costs, lost sales, bad PR, and, oh, yeah, the actual firmware engineering, and that difference grows dramatically.

Take your pick: $1200+++/LOC for crappy code, or $80-- for world-class.

One wonders why we as an industry continue to flail around with poor practices that are ultimately expensive and even deadly, when there is a body of knowledge that is provably effective.

Literature

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/20/business/toyota-reaches-1-2-billion-settlement-in-criminal-inquiry.html

[2] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/26/toyota-settlement_n_2366720.html

[3] http://www.edn.com/design/automotive/4423428/Toyota-s-killer-firmware--Bad-design-and-its-consequences

[4] http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nvs/pdf/NASA-UA_report.pdf


http://www.elektronikpraxis.vogel.de/themen/embeddedsoftwareengineering/management/articles/465678/
 

Friday, October 17, 2014

Toyota: We Lied About Acceleration Glitches, Twice



Toyota: We Lied About Acceleration Glitches, Twice

Prius-toyota-crash
A 2005 Toyota Prius that crashed into a stone wall in suburban New York. The driver claimed the hybrid sped up on its own.

Image: Seth Wenig/Associated Press
 
By Todd Wasserman
 
The U.S. Attorney's Office fined Toyota $1.2 billion on Wednesday because it lied about two incidents that led to unintended acceleration in its vehicles in 2009 and 2010.

The fine, the largest that the U.S. Department of Justice has ever levied against an automaker, is subject to judicial review. The DOJ deferred prosecution against Toyota after the company admitted that it misled U.S. consumers about defective floor mats and sticky pedals.

“Rather than promptly disclosing and correcting safety issues about which they were aware, Toyota made misleading public statements to consumers and gave inaccurate facts to Members of Congress,” Attorney General Eric Holder said in a press release.
This statement is inaccurate:

The issue became public in August 2009 after an accident in San Diego, Calif., killed a family of four.
 
The issue became public in August 2009 after an accident in San Diego, Calif., killed a family of four. A Lexus dealer had improperly installed an all-weather floor mat into a Lexus ES350. The mat entrapped the gas pedal, accelerating the car at full throttle. The incident occurred after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) had opened a defect investigation into the ES350 over that issue in 2007 and identified other Lexus models that might be similarly defective.
An August 28th 2010 crash near San Diego of a Lexus ES 350 sedan driven by the off-duty Highway Patrol officer, Mark Saylor resulted in tragedy.

TOYOTA settled the TRAGIC DEATHS OF THE SAYLOR FAMILY, after much delay, with a CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT for $10 MILLION, then blamed the dealership that had the AGREEMENT lifted to speak out.
$10 MILLION represents 'innocence'?
There is evidence that the floor mat was NOT at fault, but employed by TOYOTA as a subterfuge rather than correcting SUDDEN UNINTENDED ACCELERATION problems with TOYOTA/LEXUS VEHICLES.

Toyota launched its own internal probe of the issue that year identifying the issue, but didn't share those results with the NHTSA. The company recalled 55,000 mats in 2007, but not any vehicles. The company then revised internal guidelines for a minimum clearance of 10 mm from a fully depressed gas pedal to the floor. However, the guidelines weren't applied to all vehicles — and not to the ES350 involved in the San Diego accident. As a result, despite knowing the vehicles had a potentially fatal defect, Toyota kept producing them to the same specifications.

Meanwhile, Toyota was also hiding a second problem with its vehicles that led to unintended acceleration: a sticky pedal. That defect was based on a plastic material that could cause gas pedals to stick in a partially depressed position. Such pedals, manufactured by a U.S. company known as A-Pedal Co., were installed in the Camry, Avalon and Corolla in the United States.

Although Toyota informed European distributors about the issue and instituted an informal recall (if a customer complained, he could receive a new pedal installed for free), Toyota failed to notify U.S. regulators. Toyota execs in the U.S. identified the problem around the same time of the San Diego accident in 2009. The company then opted to implement a design change addressing the problem.
However, it left no paper trail of this change. In November 2009, while negotiating a floor mat recall with the NTHSA, Toyota failed to mention the sticky pedal problem.

Publicly, Toyota also lied about its knowledge of the sticky pedal problem.
Publicly, Toyota also lied about its knowledge of the sticky pedal problem. On Nov. 25, 2009, the company's U.S. subsidiary offered the following statement: “The safety of our owners and the public is our utmost concern and Toyota has and will continue to thoroughly investigate and take appropriate measures to address any defect trends that are identified.”

A Toyota rep also told the press, “We’re very, very confident that we have addressed this issue.”

Though public awareness of the issue in late 2009 was relatively low, it became front-page news the following January as Toyota recalled 5.2 million vehicles for the floor mat issue and another 2.3 million vehicles for sticky accelerator. It recalled another 1.8 million vehicles for both issues, bringing the total to a whopping 9.3 million cars worldwide.

The recalls, which are blamed for five deaths, caused a sharp drop-off in the public perception of Toyota. Four years later, the issue has faded from public consciousness. However, the latest disclosures may change that.

In a statement addressing the disclosure, Christopher P. Reynolds, the chief legal officer of Toyota North America, said:
At the time of these recalls, we took full responsibility for any concerns our actions may have caused customers, and we rededicated ourselves to earning their trust. In the more than four years since these recalls, we have gone back to basics at Toyota to put our customers first. [...] Entering this agreement, while difficult, is a major step toward putting this unfortunate chapter behind us.



 
The news comes as General Motors is grappling with its own recall, which affects more than 3.1 million vehicles worldwide. That recall, which has affected some Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Traverse and Saturn Outlook models over the past decade, covers a glitch in which the ignition switch in certain models can shut off while the car is running, disabling air bags and power steering. So far, this issue has been linked to 12 deaths. GM CEO Mary Barry has issued a public statement on the matter: "Something went wrong with our process in this instance, and terrible things happened."


http://mashable.com/2014/03/19/toyota-lied-aceleration-recall/


 

Friday, September 26, 2014

RSN: Jim Hood: An Attorney General Who Would Jail the Bankers



Oh? Maybe a different Attorney General would have insisted that TOYOTA correct their vehicles that are on our roads jeopardizing the safety of us all. Maybe TOYOTA'S LIES and CONCEALMENT woud have landed them in jail....whadyathink?


Send this phony baloney to prison after all the lives lost, families destroyed, people injured....






It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


*AN URGENT DRIVE TO FINISH SEPTEMBER: We are pushing very hard to finish the September funding drive. This money allows RSN to continue keeping you up to date on information the mainstream media glosses over. Without adequate funding RSN cannot continue to have that impact it now has, and that you rely on. Make your contribution today. / Marc Ash - Founder, Reader Supported News*




FOCUS: Carl Gibson | Jim Hood: An Attorney General Who Would Jail the Bankers
Mississippi attorney general Jim Hood. (photo: Rogelia V. Solis/AP)
Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News
Gibson writes: "What kind of message does it send to the biggest banks that the top attorney for one of the world's largest economies is too afraid to take them to court after those banks swindled that country out of trillions of dollars?"
READ MORE
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Toyota Acceleratorgate Settlement.....



Another TOYOTA SETTLEMENT that fully disregards the information presented by Michael Barr and others in the Oklahoma Trial of Jean Bookout and Barbara Schwarz.....SPAGHETTI SOFTWARE indeed!

Toyota Recall: The Japanese Automaker Agrees to $1.1 Billion Settlement for Acceleratorgate

Toyota Motor North America today announced an agreement to resolve economic loss litigation in the U.S. related to previous recalls by committing to actions that deliver value to its customers.

“This agreement marks a significant step forward for our company, one that will enable us to put more of our energy, time and resources into Toyota’s central focus: making the best vehicles we can for our customers and doing everything we can to meet their needs,” said Christopher P. Reynolds, group vice president and general counsel, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, and chief legal officer, Toyota Motor North America. “In keeping with our core principles, we have structured this agreement in ways that work to put our customers first and demonstrate that they can count on Toyota to stand behind our vehicles.”




Reynolds continued: “This was a difficult decision – especially since reliable scientific evidence and multiple independent evaluations have confirmed the safety of Toyota’s electronic throttle control systems. However, we concluded that turning the page on this legacy legal issue through the positive steps we are taking is in the best interests of the company, our employees, our dealers and, most of all, our customers.”

If this economic loss settlement is approved by the judge supervising multidistrict litigation (MDL) pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Toyota will launch a new customer-support program that will provide prospective supplemental coverage for certain vehicle components and will retrofit additional non-hybrid vehicle models subject to the floor mat recall with a free brake override system (BOS) to provide an added measure of confidence.

Further, assuming any appeals are resolved in favor of the settlement, Toyota will offer cash payments to eligible customers who sold or turned-in their leased vehicles in a period during 2009-2010, as well as other specified persons, and to eligible current owners and lessees who will not be offered BOS. The proposed settlement would also establish additional driver education programs and fund new research into advanced safety technologies.

Toyota also announced that it will take a one-time, $1.1 billion pre-tax charge against earnings to cover the estimated costs of the economic loss settlement and possible resolution costs of civil litigation brought in California by the District Attorney of Orange County and an investigation by a multi-state group of Attorneys General stemming from previous recalls.

Speaking of the unintended acceleration issue, although the investigation has come to a close for now, not everyone is convinced that the findings were conclusive enough to satisfy all parties involved. Will the settlement of this class-action lawsuits, as well as other total recall lawsuits appease everyone, especially the owners? Stay tuned, as the last chapter in this epic saga is far from being written…


http://jessielouthan.com/toyota-recall-japanese-automaker-agrees-1-1-billion-settlement-acceleratorgate/#


JUST MY THOUGHTS.... AT THE MOMENT....

Friday, August 8, 2014

TOYOTA'S CORPORATE PLAYBOOK....Just continue the LIES!



So....you get caught.....




....the wise person changes their behavior.....




....not so TOYODA.....





...BETSY said it best!


O spotted leopard




Betsy Benjaminson exposed TOYOTA'S LIES!



PLEASE make a contribution in whatever amount you can afford to support the TRUTH BEING HEARD:






Can we allow TOYOTA to SILENCE THE TRUTH and jeopardize lives?

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

TOYOTA protecting its SECRETS!




What Americans would like to believe is a Government that acts in their best interests is no longer to be true!


The article below is a MUST READ! :

Barr and the DOJ- what we know and what we know that we don't know


PLEASE make a contribution in whatever amount you can afford to support the TRUTH BEING HEARD:

 
 
 
Can we allow TOYOTA to SILENCE THE TRUTH and jeopardize lives?
 
 
 

Friday, June 27, 2014

The TOYOTA-GM Connection




GM Ignition Judge Names Lead Lawyers From Toyota Cases

June 26, 2014
 
The lead attorneys in lawsuits against Toyota Motor Corp. (TM:US) over sudden acceleration will take temporary charge of claims of alleged economic loss from General Motors (GM:US) vehicles that were recalled because of ignition-switch defects.

Steve W. Berman, Elizabeth Cabraser and Mark P. Robinson Jr., who helped arrange a $1.6 billion settlement with Toyota over lost vehicle value, will “initiate the process” in the GM litigation, U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman in Manhattan said in a June 24 order.

“These temporary designations are not a precursor of future appointments,” Furman said.


General Motors has recalled 2.59 million compact cars with potentially faulty ignition switches linked to at least 13 deaths. Customers have filed at least 87 proposed class actions seeking reimbursement for lost value of the recalled vehicles.

The suits are combined before Furman’s Manhattan court in a multidistrict proceeding that will address pretrial matters including evidence gathering. Furman set an initial conference to organize the suits for Aug. 11.

The case is In Re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 14-md-2543, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Margaret Cronin Fisk in Detroit at mcfisk@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net Andrew Dunn, Joe Schneider




http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-06-26/gm-ignition-judge-names-lead-lawyers-from-toyota-cases


Monday, June 9, 2014

Toyota cover-up worse than GM coverup





Toyota cover-up worse than GM coverup

Discussion in 'Other Cars' started by Troy Heagy, Saturday at 7:39 PM
 
I was pretty shocked when I read this: "...the company hid from federal regulators a second cause of unintended acceleration in its vehicles: a sticky gas pedal. The problem was caused by plastic material inside the pedal that could cause the accelerator to become stuck in a partially depressed position. The pedals were installed in several models, including the Camry, the Matrix, the Corolla and the Avalon.

"...For several months, Toyota received more evidence of the pedal problem and quietly made plans to address it without informing federal safety officials as required by law. Concerned that federal officials would learn about these plans, the company canceled the change in pedal design and communicated that change orally rather than in writing, so there would be no paper trail. After more instances of sticky pedals came to the company’s attention in 2009, executives decided to disclose the issue to federal regulators and issue a new recall. But the deception did not end there. After the recall was completed, the company produced an inaccurate timeline and submitted it to federal regulators and Congress, making it appear as if the company had acted quickly to address the sticky-pedal issue.

“Rather than promptly disclosing and correcting safety issues about which they were aware, Toyota made misleading public statements to consumers and gave inaccurate facts to members of Congress,” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said at a news conference announcing the settlement.

LINK: Toyota reaches $1.2 billion settlement to end probe of accelerator problems - The Washington Post
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Who knew that driving a Toyota or Lexus could result in jail time and worse if a sudden unintended acceleration accident occurred? Toyota said all this is over because the recall has been done and it has paid its $1.2 billion fine. THINK again if you believe that claim! The real problem currently is ELECTRONIC SUA and accidents are happening daily. Many of these involve vehicles in parking lots when braking is initiated. Storefront crashes and crashes-into-buildings/homes are reported. Toyota finds the vehicle faultless...no code stored and EDR (black box) shows no braking. However, Toyota and Lexus drivers report the vehicle "taking off" or "having a mind of its own." These same vehicles have been reported going airborne from a standstill starting point in a parking lot!

Here are the critical issues:

Sloppily-designed Toyota electronic throttle system software (see Michael Barr's findings) equals RUNAWAY---a.k.a. sudden unintended acceleration----Toyota and Lexus vehicles.

Worse? The electronic fail-safe---a.k.a. the way to stop the runaway---is also rendered ineffective at the time of the SUA glitch (Michael Barr, embedded software expert).

Translation? Your runaway Toyota or Lexus is not going to stop until something stops it!

Even worse? Your Toyota or Lexus EDR---a.k.a black box---is going to record inconsistent, unreliable data (see Dr. Antony Anderson's findings).

Problem? You will be CHARGED for any deaths or injuries to others as a result of an accident your runaway vehicle causes based on the faulty EDR results and an assumption of "driver pedal misapplication."

More of a problem? You may go to JAIL or prison if the EDR erroneously shows that you are not braking---which it has for others more often than not. Essentially, you will be deemed not telling the truth or confused in media coverage because Toyota will say its EDR is accurate---even though it admitted this data was unreliable previously.

Even a bigger problem? If there is any chance a detail comes out that supports the driver, the media will take sides with the automaker and support your character assassination publicly. Are you on prescription meds or any medications? Are you an older citizen? Are you a woman and older? Bingo! Elderly pedal misapplication, according to media and Toyota.

Don't worry...all your skeletons will be dug up as Toyota goes full steam ahead to escape blame for faulty electronics! Just keep track of all these mysterious vehicles-into-homes and storefront crashes and read the headlines. Read the PR propaganda supporting driver error.

Toyota's $$ goes far and wide...even to the heart of the very agency commissioned to protect your SAFETY! The DOJ and NHTSA are still looking the other way---a.k.a. protecting corporate interests. They do not want to open up the ELECTRONIC sudden unintended acceleration issue as then there will be a public cover-up scandal which rivals the best---or worst---of them.

All the above doesn't factor in the so far little-known in the U.S. whistleblower, Betsy Benjaminson. She's has copies of hundreds of internal Toyota documents. Many of these show clear evidence of concern over an electronic throttle system problem---a.k.a. "ghost in the engine"---and the lack of fix for it. Betsy has a blog where she has posted some of the evidence. She's been the feature of several articles and a podcast interview outside the U.S. Google her name to find.

Toyota, the media, and the government seem to be handling each new suspicious runaway vehicle accident---a.k.a. driver states pressing brake when the vehicle takes off, becomes airborne, has a mind of its own, etc.---on a case-by-case basis. Apparently, there is the hope that each case will blow over with little public attention. There is hope, too, that the public buys into the PR machine working overtime with law enforcement and media to BLAME the vehicle driver. SUA victim = SCAPEGOAT.

As far as Toyota is concerned, it is DONE with the topic of sudden unintended acceleration. Period. It got the free pass with a huge U.S. Government fine---a.k.a. permission not to face the music regarding ELECTRONIC SUA. Floor mats, pedals, driver error...done DEAL.

Toyota's well-orchestrated smoke screen continues aided and abetted by our very own safety regulatory agency. Can't beat that! The sky's the limit now...think of all the untoward consequences for Toyota owners, not to mention the driving public.

Toyota is #1 in numbers of sudden unintended acceleration events. BUT...it is not alone! This is an industry-wide phenomenon and not one automaker wants the public knowledgeable about ELECTRONIC sudden unintended acceleration.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Is there a reason....?

The article below, picked up by a 'local paper' pillories General Motors' Memo....so how come they ignored TOYOTA?



This is outdated and we'll never know the true numbers.....one study determined that only 13% of people ever file complaint....

General Motors was wrong concealing a failure that caused the deaths of 13 people...WHAT ABOUT TOYOTA?


Is TOYOTA writing General Motors' articles to excuse TOYOTA'S conduct?

By







52. On or about December 10, 2009, only after the floor mat entrapment recall


remedy had been fully negotiated with NHTSA and announced to the public, TOYOTA finally


issued to A-Pedal Company renewed pedal design change instructions to address sticky pedal in

newly produced vehicles in the United States. Whereas the single design change instruction that

had issued for the U.S. market on or about October 5, 2009 (and then been cancelled on or about

October 21, 2009) had called for a “major” change that would have entailed scrapping of old

parts, the new design change instructions were issued as “minor” changes – a designation that

entailed no part number change and allowed for use of old, defective parts until inventory was

exhausted. TOYOTA engineers decided to characterize the changes as minor to prevent their

detection by NHTSA. The newly issued design change instructions were to go into effect in or

about mid-January 2010, around the same time that TOYOTA would be implementing pedal


design changes for models encompassed by the floor mat entrapment recall.

 

53. At or about the same time that TOYOTA was issuing renewed design change

instructions to remedy sticky pedal in newly produced U.S. vehicles, CQE-J instructed TMS that


issuance of a “technical service bulletin” to Toyota dealers alerting them to the sticky pedal


problem and explaining how it should be remedied for vehicles in the field was “not permitted.”


Under NHTSA regulations, any such communication would have to have been disclosed to

NHTSA.
 
 
 


Look sincere and LIE!
 
 
 

65. TOYOTA made inaccurate statements during the course of an investigation


initiated by the United States Congress in or about late January 2010. Consistent with the talking


points described above, but contrary to certain internal documents that TOYOTA had itself

produced to Congress among thousands of other documents, TOYOTA repeated to Congress that it

became aware of sticky pedal in the United States in October 2009, when in fact it had been


investigating sticky pedal in the United States since no later than August 2009.
 



OK! So TOYOTA lied about floor mats and accelerator pedals....where's the rest of TOYOTA'S LIES?

Where is the following included in the DOJ TOYOTA SETTLEMENT and why the cover up?

 "Toyota's killer firmware: Bad design and its consequences") what Mr. Barr concluded:

>  Toyota's electronic throttle control system (ETCS) source code is of unreasonable quality.
>  Toyota's source code is defective and contains bugs, including bugs that can cause unintended acceleration (UA)
>  Code-quality metrics predict presence of additional bugs.
>  Toyota's fail safes are defective and inadequate (referring to them as a 'house of cards' safety architecture).
>  Misbehaviours of Toyota's ETCS are a cause of UA.
 
From:


CLICK ON LINK TO READ THE REST