Showing posts with label Fair Credit Reportng Act violations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fair Credit Reportng Act violations. Show all posts

Thursday, December 4, 2014

LEMON LADY.....



....takes credit for NOTHING!



Life is simple!

When the BRAKES FAIL ON A BRAND NEW TOYOTA.....FIX IT!


This isn't about the LEMON LADY'S ILLEGALLY OBTAINED CREDIT REPORTS!

This isn't about STALKING, SPYING, SHARING THE LEMON LADY'S MEDICAL RECORDS!






Charlene M. Blake (@charleneblake)
Writing IS on wall! #LemonLady is right! #NHTSA & #automakers been #spinning web of #distraction for months! jessiepowell.blogspot.com/2014/12/nhtsa-…



TOYOTA: FIX YOUR FREAKIN' CARS!









And NHTSA:

STOP GENUFLECTING AND DO YOUR JOB TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC!






JUST MY OPINION AT THE MOMENT.......




Wednesday, July 17, 2013

#1 Let's not forget what this is about....

This isn't just about a LEMON!



1. This is about a dealership that employed misleading tactics to obtain my social security number in order to request my credit report - not once, but TWICE!


The 2nd time was ~ 6 MONTHS AFTER I purchased and paid for the BRAND NEW LEMON.

Route 44 Toyota: Where Arrogance and Disregard of the Law Prevails


I was scammed because I didn't know the law. Please, please, don't allow yourself to be put in that position!

These are the legal reasons a credit report may be requested, none of which apply to Route 44 Toyota [bore yourself if you're so inclined]:

Route 44 Toyota and FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act]
 

In addition to requesting MY credit report ~ 6 months AFTER the LEMON was purchased, they requested the credit report of a friend - unrelated to the car - his name is NOT on the title.

I wrote numerous letters and filed complaints in an attempt to remove the inquiries.

The credit inquiries were Faxed immediately upon discovery to the Arrogant Dilly, Dally Dan Viera, who ignored the issue until it was posted on dealerrater.

A Temper Tantrum was thrown!

 
 
 
When the truthful and accurate information was posted on dealerrater, Dilly, Dally Dan BULLIED me with threats of a SLAPP Suit [Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation].
 
 
 
At a time of heightened awareness about BULLYING, Attorney Dan Viera and his client, Route 44 Toyota are woefully out of touch. BULLYING is not different regardless of the target.  
 
Folks, know your rights when you deal with BULLIES!

Explained here:

Route 44 Toyota Threatens SLAPP

  • The Costs of SLAPP Suits

  • SLAPP and the First Amendment 

    ...classic SLAPP suit. The point of it was to shut Alexandria up and to shut up the commenters. I think you’ve touched on the fact that this was a—the people involved in this enjoy a position of privilege in the community, and they are not used to having their misdeeds laid bare.
     
     

    This would have been easily resolved were it not for ARROGANCE!

    Route 44 Toyota could have acknowledged their ILLEGAL error and removed the inquiries.

    That's the problem with ARROGANCE.


    Is this the kind of business you want in your life?

    I'm sorry they're in mine.



     
     

    Saturday, July 13, 2013

    Rip Off Report

    Below are comments posted on Rip Off Report.....


     
    Submitted: Thu, January 31, 2013

    April 2012, I purchased a 2012 Prius C. In less than 1 month, I reported 3 'incidents.'

    The last 2 of those incidents was BRAKE FAILURE, which a Route 44 Toyota technician sitting in the passenger seat of the vehicle witnessed repeatedly.

    The vehicle had NO BRAKES. Route 44 Toyota refused to address the issue, denied the problem, indicated 'No Computer Error Message.'

    Route 44 Toyota made 3 credit inquiries and I never applied for credit. In addition, they ran a credit inquiry of an unrelated third party who also did no apply for credit 6 months after I paid for the vehicle. This violates our rights under FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act].

    They gathered my information when I test drove a vehicle. Please check your credit report if you have been to this dealership. Their actions are illegal.

    #1 Author of original report

    Route 44 Toyota Threatens SLAPP suit for posting the truth

    AUTHOR: Middleboro Review - ()

    When I initially became aware that Route 44 Toyota had illegally requested my credit report twice, as well as that of a disinterested 3rd Party, my attorney faxed copies of those inquiries to their attorney, Daniel Viera.
    In response to my posting that truthful information in this forum, Daniel Viera threatened a SLAPP suit - Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, with the intent to silence and intimidate.
    Rather than acknowledging an error and removing all 3 credit inquiries, Attorney Viera's bizarre response --
    "I am not at liberty to discuss with you in detail why those claims are both false....."
    For those interested in boring themselves, the reasons for which credit inquiries may be made according to the FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act] are posted here:

    http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/2013/04/route-44-toyota-and-fcra-fair-credit.html
    Since the law clearly enumerates specificity, surely disclosure of their nefarious reasons was warranted.
    2 of those inquiries were made subsequent to suit having been filed and all communication should have ceased which it did not.
    Plymouth Court: Civil Action #1259CV871
    Another Route 44 Toyota customer posted a similar problem in the RipOff Report web site that
    #3 Author of original report

    Route 44 Toyota Threatens SLAPP Suit

    AUTHOR: Middleboro Review - ()

    On the day I delivered payment in full for our new Prius, I provided my social security number to Route 44 Toyota for them to complete documents for the Registry of Motor Vehicles.

    On that day, they ran my credit report even though I NEVER applied for credit and NO signed credit application exists.

    On the day Route 44 Toyota discovered MY vehicle on their property with no license plates [because I had turned them in], they ran my credit report, as well as the credit report of a disinterested 3rd party.

    Our brand new vehicle was left on the property of Route 44 Toyota because it has NO BRAKES!

    How can I drive a vehicle with NO BRAKES?

    On that day, we did not travel to Route 44 Toyota nor complete any credit applications. Route 44 Toyota had already been put on notice of a lawsuit and failed to cease communicating with me.

    Unauthorized access to credit information is in violation of FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act], a federal statute. It is ILLEGAL.

    Because I posted this, Route 44 Toyota is now threatening a SLAPP suit, explained here:

    http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/2013/03/route-44-toyota-threatens-slapp-suit.html
    In response to my complaint filed with CFPB [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau], Credco responded:
    Our investigation into this matter determined that [complainant's] credit report was ordered by our client, Route 44, on or about April 23, 2012 and October 11, 2012, respectively. In order to obtain these credit reports on [complainant], Route 44 represented to us each time that it had a permissible purpose to do so. After receipt of this complaint, Credco contacted Route 44 and confirmed the certification of permissible purpose. The address and telephone number for Route 44 is as follows:

    Route 44 Toyota

    1094 New State Hwy.

    Raynham, MA 02767

    Phone: 508-824-4044


    Dan Viera, attorney for Route 44 Toyota indicated, here comes the SLAPP threat:
    "I am not at liberty to discuss with you in detail why those claims are both false. I suspect that you will amend your complaint regardless of what the facts may be but let me simply tell you that the dealership can only obtain a credit report from a customer or potential customer who has provided their social security number. That information is not collected as part of the test drive of a motor vehicle."

    "In that regard, your client has recently made a post on an online website referred to as
    www.dealerrater.com. Apparently, that web site is used in an attempt to resolve disputes between automobile dealers and consumers by allowing the consumer to post information and providing the dealership with an opportunity to respond before the post becomes official.....In it [the complainant] claims that the dealership "illegally" accessed her credit report. Accusing the dealership of engaging in illegal activity is libel per se. My client does not take these matters lightly and I would suggest that you communicate with your client to cease and desist from these types of tactics. They will not serve to resolve her case but do expose her to potential liability. Your client is represented by counsel and has a pending lawsuit. She should let you do your job."

    I filed a 'Petition for Defect Investigation' with NHTSA that they are pursuing. The Toyota Prius had NO BRAKES and you will find other similar complaints listed on the NHTSA web site.

    Route 44 Toyota REFUSED to repair or replace my vehicle.

    Wednesday, June 19, 2013

    The Corrupt System of Credit Reporting


    The article below highlights problems with CREDIT REPORTING.

    There is simply no accountability!

    Route 44 Toyota ILLEGALLY accessed my credit report TWICE and that of a friend - 6 MONTHS after a new car was paid for.
    We NEVER applied for credit. This violated FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act].

    There is no way other than court to force Route 44 Toyota to be accountable.

     
     

    Posted here:
    Route 44 Toyota: Where Arrogance and Disregard of the Law Prevails

    A Corrupt System More Americans Need to be Talking About


    In this country we concern ourselves with a varying degree of issues.  But there’s one that I rarely see mentioned anywhere and it has massive control over much of our lives—and that control only grows with each passing year.

    While many fear the government and what it might “prevent us” from doing, this is something that has the power to make Americans pay tens of thousands more throughout their lives and it can even keep them from getting a job.

    And the kicker?  Nobody really tells us how it’s calculated.

    I’m talking about our credit scores.

    And anyone who’s dealt with these credit rating companies know, they make massive errors—constantly.  Hell, we have three different scores depending on which company’s score you’re looking at.

    I was once listed at an address I had never lived at.  Trying to get the company to change that seemed nearly impossible.  Accounts that weren’t mine have shown up without me knowing, and the only real way to monitor these companies is to pay to have access to your report.  Sure, you can get one free report a year from AnnualCreditReport.com, but that’s just once per year.  If you want hands-on monitoring of your credit reports, you’ll have to pay.


    And as we’ve progressed technologically as a society, these credit scores have become more and more intrusive into our lives.  Once they just determined your “worthiness” of getting some line of credit.  Now your credit score is often used to determine your insurance rates for your car or home and can even determine whether or not you’re allowed to open a checking account.

    Nothing quite like paying 5, 10, 15+ years on car or home owner’s insurance, without a single claim or late payment, yet unexpectedly falling on rough times privately (though still paying both insurance policies on time) only to still see your insurance rates double because your credit rating dropped.

    It doesn’t make any sense.  Your insurance record should be your “credit score” for insurance policies.  Your record as a home owner or driver should be all that’s needed to determine your rates. 

    Being unable to pay your cell phone bill, resulting in downgraded credit, shouldn’t have a damn thing to do with how much someone pays for insurance when their insurance history is immaculate.

    Hell, even employers have taken up with the practice of running your credit score before offering someone a job.  Which is extremely ironic considering people get denied for jobs due to their poor credit, yet if these people were given these jobs, they would have the income to pay their bills and improve their credit score.

    Another issue that arises is how credit “hits” are handled.  It’s my opinion that unless your good payments are shown on your credit report, the bad payments shouldn’t be allowed.  Too often people will pay perfectly for years on items such as their cell phone or cable bill, only to fall on bad times. 

    Some unfortunate event happens where they can no longer makes these payments, the services are shut off and the balances are then sent to a debt collector and the “default” is put on your credit report.

    Never mind that you might have paid for a decade flawlessly, that won’t show up anywhere—the only part that will appear on your report will be where you stopped paying.

    Then there’s the completely asinine statement many have heard, “Bad credit is better than no credit.” 

    You could be financially stable, making good money, and have paid cash for most everything you’ve had.  Then one day find yourself in a situation where you have to take out a line of credit, well—good luck with that.  The fact that you have no debt is actually bad.

    These people want you to have debt—but not too much.  See, your debt to income ration needs to be solid.  Meaning your debt needs to be a certain percentage of your income.  A debt to income ratio too high or too low will negatively impact your score.

    Or there’s the stories I’ve heard about people pulling their individual credit scores and getting one number, say 705, only to apply for a loan and have that same company report their score as much lower—with no explanation as to why.

    And I can’t forget the whole circus performance from these companies in how they reflect how you pay your debt.  Did you know, you can actually hurt your score by paying off installment loans too soon?  That closing a credit card often hurts your credit score?  That you need balances on cards otherwise opening credit accounts with zero balance can lower your score as well?  That following credit “promotions” and paying balances off before the interest would kick in can cause your score to drop too?

    Does any of that make sense?  Hell no.

    Now we all know why this system is set up the way it is, to screw most Americans.  It’s built to give companies an excuse to pay you less or charge you more.

    Millions of Americans end up paying tens of thousands more throughout their lifetime because of a credit system built on secrecy, confusion and frustration.

    While many might just say “pay your bills on time and you’ll have good credit,” that’s simply an ignorant response from someone who doesn’t know the first thing about how credit scores work.
    If credit scores were just about paying bills, someone with no credit but a flawless record paying their bills (with cash) would have the best score.  But like I said before, if they have no credit they’re actually worse off most times than someone with bad credit.

    And these companies really don’t “lose” money when people fail to pay their bills.  What almost every one of these companies does is create an account in their yearly budgets they consider “losses.”  But they balance these losses by overcharging services elsewhere.  Even if they had 100% of their customers pay their bills, they still would have this account where they assumed loss and still continue to charge customers more.

    Then they “sell” these delinquent accounts to debt collectors for a fraction of what’s owed.  Then these debt collectors attempt to make a profit by making you pay “40% of your balance to settle this debt”—when they might have only paid 10% (or less) of what the original debt actually was.

    So not only are most of these original companies not suffering any kind of real loss, because they’ve already assumed a certain amount of “loss” while charging more for their services to account for that, debt companies are making millions collecting money on debt that was never owed to them.  They just bid a small percentage on the total debt, then pretend to offer “deals” to get people to pay them money.

    It’s a system rigged to squeeze as much as possible out of people, while trapping them into debt.
    Because that’s what a “good credit score” essentially tells you that you must do—have debt to have good credit.  It’s a scam that I feel more people need to talk about—be enraged about.

    It’s ridiculous that a handful of private companies, with seemingly no accountability to anyone, have such power over the lives of each and every one of us.  Then when we demand answers, they refuse to give us any.

    And I feel it’s about damn time we put an end to this scam.

    http://www.forwardprogressives.com/a-corrupt-system-more-americans-need-to-be-talking-about/



     

    Sunday, June 2, 2013

    Route 44 Toyota: Where Arrogance and Disregard of the Law Prevails




    On April 23, 2012, payment in full was presented to Route 44 Toyota for a BRAND NEW VEHICLE that subsequently turned into a LEMON.


    [This cartoon reminds me sooo much of Attorney Viera, otherwise nicknamed 'Dilly, Dally Dan' preparing himself for a Supreme Court case, elevating a defective car to silliness.]

    Here's the RMV-1 form:

    Note item #22 requests License #/ID#/ or SSN.
     
    When the paperwork was being completed by a youthful twerp who knows how to fast-talk and totally confuse with the flurry of paperwork, he requested my Social Security number.
     
    I challenged the request and offered my MA license number, yet he insisted the form required my Social Security number.
     
    You will note that the form does NOT require the purchaser's signature so I would have no way to know that I had just been Flim-Flammed.
     
     
     
    That's how the sleazy clowns at Route 44 Toyota obtained my Social Security Number.
     
    On that day, Route 44 Toyota requested my credit report even though the vehicle was fully paid for.
     
    They retained my Social Security Number.
     
    On October 11, 2012, almost 6 months after the LEMON was purchased, Route 44 Toyota awakened to the fact that my vehicle was on their property with no license plates.
     
    Why? Because I had turned the plates in in August and cancelled the insurance.
    Why should I pay for a vehicle with funky, unpredictable behavior?
     
    Tony Roma left a message on my answering machine because the right hand apparently doesn't know what the left hand does.
     
    The Not-Very-Bright Bulb sputtered when I returned his call, unable to remember the purpose of his message. thought financing was a problem, sputter, sputter.
     
     
     
    My LEMON was sitting on the property of Route 44 Toyota, as it had been since May 2012 when I refused to drive a vehicle with NO BRAKES.
     
     
     
    My LEMON had a valid inspection sticker. Wouldn't even a dumb bunny comprehend that you don't inspect a vehicle until it is registered????
     
     
     
    I suggested that he pull up my information on his computer before he continue to comment.
     
    The reference to being unable to obtain financing seems to indicate that Route 44 Toyota had already pulled my credit report even though I had NOT applied for credit, had not communicated with Route 44 Toyota.
     
    In addition, the Clown even requested the credit report of a friend whose name is NOT on the title of the vehicle.
     
     
     
     
    When the call was returned to Brain-Dead Tony Roma, he sought a resolution and I recommended that he have their attorney contact my attorney because a law suit had been filed, Route 44 Toyota had been served.  
     
    I was forced to put him on notice to delete my contact information from their records, cease harassing me, cease communicating with me because I was represented by counsel.
     
     


    The rest of the arrogance of Route 44 Toyota has been explained elsewhere when they threatened a SLAPP Suit to bully and intimidate because I posted that they had illegally requested credit reports.

    Had Route 44 Toyota been an honorable business, they would have acknowledged their error [that they got caught] and removed the credit inquiries. Arrogance prevailed!

    At the top of the Middleboro Review blog is a SEARCH feature in the upper left hand column - type in SLAPP [Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation] or FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act], and Voila! previously posted entries.



     
     
     
     
     
      
     
     
     

    Monday, May 27, 2013

    Happy Memorial Day! And Thanks To All For Sharing!

    A friend who is a Retired, Disabled Veteran encouraged me to attend the Middleboro Memorial Day Parade.

    On a day memorializing those lost fighting for Freedom, what could be more appropriate?



    The disdainful looks were curious, to say the least.
     
    Since an ancestor has fought in every war since the American Revolution [and a few prior to that], too many on the pretext of defending our Constitution and our Freedoms that used to include Freedom of Speech [among other we seem to have forgotten], far too many require an education in history or at the very least a re-read of our Founding Documents.

    Once again, thanks for all who shared bad experiences. How pathetic that we have too little recourse?  

    Once again, it was impressive how many spoke highly of Copeland Toyota.

    Sorry no one told me before I went to Route 44 Toyota!

    As consumers, a car is the 2nd most expensive item purchased and we have a right to expect integrity and accountability.

     
    Beyond purchasing a LEMON from Route 44 Toyota, accessing credit reports in violation of FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act] is beyond reprehensible.

     
    Even more so, when it was done ~ 6 months after the purchase.


    Being too arrogant to acknowledge their legal violation is insulting. There was simply no justification for trashing my legal rights!


    Route 44 Toyota could have simply removed the credit inquiries, yet instead bullied, threatening a SLAPP suit [Stategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation].



    Is this a business you want to patronize?