Saturday, September 5, 2015

2 TOYOTA SAFETY RECALLS



Your vehicle may be involved in a safety recall and may create a safety risk for you or your passengers. Safety defects must be repaired by a certified dealer at no cost to you. However, if left unrepaired, a potential safety defect in your vehicle could lead to injury or even death. Read this entire email to find out more and learn what you should do next.
What is a recall?
When a manufacturer or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) determines that a car or item of motor vehicle equipment creates an unreasonable risk to safety or fails to meet minimum safety standards, the manufacturer is required to fix that car or equipment at no cost to the consumer. That can be done by repairing it, replacing it, offering a refund (for equipment) or, in rare cases, repurchasing the car.
Why am I getting this email?
You are receiving this message because you requested to be notified by NHTSA if there is a safety recall affecting your vehicle.
The following recall may apply to one or more of your vehicles. Click on the NHTSA Campaign ID number below to read more about the safety issue and the reason for the recall.
To find out if your vehicle is included in the recall, use our VIN Look-up Tool.
NHTSA Campaign ID Number :15V514
Manufacturer :Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC
Make / Model Years :TOYOTA / 2015
Subject :TPMS Incorrectly Calibrated/FMVSS 138
What should I do if my vehicle is included in this recall?
If your vehicle is included in this recall, it is very important that you get it fixed as soon as possible given the potential danger to you and your passengers if it is not addressed. You should receive a separate letter in the mail from the vehicle manufacturer, notifying you of the recall and explaining when the remedy will be available, whom to contact to repair your vehicle or equipment, and to remind you that the repair will be done at no charge to you. If you believe your vehicle is included in the recall, but you do not receive a letter in the mail from the vehicle manufacturer, please call NHTSA's Vehicle Safety Hotline at 888-327-4236 or contact your vehicle manufacturer or dealership.


Your vehicle may be involved in a safety recall and may create a safety risk for you or your passengers. Safety defects must be repaired by a certified dealer at no cost to you. However, if left unrepaired, a potential safety defect in your vehicle could lead to injury or even death. Read this entire email to find out more and learn what you should do next.
What is a recall?
When a manufacturer or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) determines that a car or item of motor vehicle equipment creates an unreasonable risk to safety or fails to meet minimum safety standards, the manufacturer is required to fix that car or equipment at no cost to the consumer. That can be done by repairing it, replacing it, offering a refund (for equipment) or, in rare cases, repurchasing the car.
Why am I getting this email?
You are receiving this message because you requested to be notified by NHTSA if there is a safety recall affecting your vehicle.
The following recall may apply to one or more of your vehicles. Click on the NHTSA Campaign ID number below to read more about the safety issue and the reason for the recall.
To find out if your vehicle is included in the recall, use our VIN Look-up Tool.
NHTSA Campaign ID Number :15V515
Manufacturer :Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC
Make / Model Years :TOYOTA / 2010-2015
Subject :Accessory Exhaust Tips May Burn People
What should I do if my vehicle is included in this recall?
If your vehicle is included in this recall, it is very important that you get it fixed as soon as possible given the potential danger to you and your passengers if it is not addressed. You should receive a separate letter in the mail from the vehicle manufacturer, notifying you of the recall and explaining when the remedy will be available, whom to contact to repair your vehicle or equipment, and to remind you that the repair will be done at no charge to you. If you believe your vehicle is included in the recall, but you do not receive a letter in the mail from the vehicle manufacturer, please call NHTSA's Vehicle Safety Hotline at 888-327-4236 or contact your vehicle manufacturer or dealership.


Friday, September 4, 2015

Beasley Allen secures $8 million verdict for victim injured in Volkswagen crash




VW, Honeywell Must Pay $4.8M In Unintended Acceleration Suit

By Daniel Langhorne
Law360, New York (September 2, 2015, 10:31 PM ET) -- A Georgia federal jury found Wednesday that Volkswagen Group of America Inc. and Honeywell International Inc. were liable for $4.8 million in damages for an accident in which a woman suffered serious injuries allegedly caused by unintended acceleration stemming from a “defective” supercharger in her Volkswagen Passat.

Prior to the jury verdict, U.S. District Court Judge Clay D. Land had held in a pre-trial order in July that the 2011 collision was not caused by the supercharger in the car owned by plaintiffs Cheryl and Kevin...



Beasley Allen secures $8 million verdict for victim injured in Volkswagen crash


posted on:
September 3, 2015
dunson and andrews vw verdict 2015 250x140 Beasley Allen secures $8 million verdict for victim injured in Volkswagen crash
A federal court jury awarded a Carroll County, Ga., woman and her husband $8 million in a case of sudden unintended acceleration that left Plaintiff Cheryl Bullock severely and permanently injured after a September 2011 crash.
Ms. Bullock was traveling with her 5-year-old daughter when her 2004 Volkswagen Passat GLS TDI suddenly accelerated out of her control, causing the vehicle to leave the roadway and overturn. The lawsuit alleged Volkswagen Group of America and Honeywell International were aware of a defect in the vehicle’s turbo charger that could lead to sudden acceleration problems. Ms. Bullock and her husband, Kevin Bullock, were represented by Beasley Allen attorneys Kendall C. Dunson and D. Michael Andrews.
“The lives of the Bullocks were changed forever as a result of a decision by the defendants to ignore a dangerous product defect,” Andrews said. “No amount of money can give a person back their health and well-being, but we hope this judgement will help convince auto manufacturers to do the right thing in order to prevent such catastrophic crashes in the future.”
The jury agreed with the Plaintiffs’ case alleging the Passat and its turbo charger were subject to a defect that allowed the introduction of combustible accelerants to the Passat engine, resulting in uncontrolled acceleration. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Columbus Division. Case no. 4:13-cv-00037-CDL.
Related News


Toyota Corolla crashes into Wendy's “Honestly I think it’s an engineering flaw, and something needs to be done”.....




Charlene M. Blake (@charleneblake)
Jasko who towed the #TOYOTA #COROLLA: "Honestly I think it’s an engineering flaw, and something needs to be done."

newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/09/03/par…


VIDEO ON LINK

2 Vehicles Sent Crashing Into Paramus Wendy’s After Collision

SUV Crashed Into Same Wendy's In June

Car crashes through fence and into house wall in Grange Rd, Toorak



Car crashes through fence and into house wall in Grange Rd, Toorak

September 4, 2015 1:18am


AN ELDERLY driver’s luxury SUV ploughed into the side of a Toorak mansion this afternoon, giving a housekeeper the shock of her life.
The car, driven by an 80-year-old Kooyong man, lost control and ploughed into the side of the mansion in St Georges Rd.
Highway patrol Senior Constable David Refled said the driver came down from Grange Rd and had a near-collision with another car going through the roundabout.

“The driver accelerated at a high speed to avoid the collision, he then hit the back of another car and shot off into the side of the house,” Sen-Constable Refled said.
The house was badly damaged. Picture: David Crosling
The four-wheel drive came to rest in the wall. Picture: David Crosling
There was a housekeeper inside at the time.
Metropolitan Fire Brigade station officer Chris Schey said she was uninjured.
The elderly driver was taken to The Alfred hospital with no serious injuries but was said to be shaken up over the incident.
Sen-Constable Refled said he had spoken to the owner of the house.
“She’s really shocked and unfortunately she can’t get here yet because of the train strike - she’s just watching it all unfold on the news I think,” he said.



Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Toyota Sudden Unintended Acceleration Timeline





Toyota Sudden Unintended Acceleration Timeline


Toyota Sudden Unintended Acceleration Timeline
Last Updated: August 31, 2015

A Brief Review:



Toyota has come under fire in recent years due to the frequency of sudden unintended acceleration incidents in their car models. Although complaints and reports were files against Toyota's cars, Toyota willfully mislead the public to believe that they were unaware of any problems with their cars and that many of the incidents were due to driver error. It was eventually discovered that Toyota knew about their unintended acceleration problems and did nothing to fix them or warn the drivers of the affected cars. Toyota went through multiple court cases for wrongful death and loss of car value cases, and in 2012, ended up paying more than a billion dollars in a class action suit against them by drivers of Toyota and Lexus cars. Toyota was also forced to pay a fine of $1.2 billion to the Department of Justice for their deceptive practices. The following is a breakdown of the history of the Toyota scandal:


1. The First Incidents:



There have been scattered reports of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles as early as 1992, when a man, Stanley Sirnick, was killed after his 1992 4Runner accelerated out of control on a winding road. His brother who survived the crash noted in the report that the car was on cruise control at about 40mph when the car started accelerating. The brakes were not effective and the car flipped over after being driven up an embankment to avoid a cliff.

Starting in 2002, a huge influx of complaints started coming in regarding Toyota car engines surging when the brake pedals were depressed, specifically on the 2002 Camry model. 2 examples of incidents include Maria Cafua, who died due to injury complications when her Camry accelerated across 3 lanes in Wilmington, Massachusetts, and George and Maureen Yago, who were killed when their car accelerated in a parking structure and flew off a ledge. Later Camry models also seemed to have a major problem with unintended acceleration. Juanita Grossman of Evansville, Indiana, was driving her 2003 Camry when it suddenly accelerated across the street and into a jewelry store. Juanita's feet were both jamming down the brake pedal when she was recovered from the car. She later succumbed to her injuries.
In 2003, Peter Boddaert, a 1996 Lexus LS 400 owner, experienced SUA and reported his multiple incidents to the NHTSA. He petitioned them to analyze the Lexus 1997-2000 Lexus 300 and 400 models. This petition, however, was denied due to the NHTSA reporting that there were no data showing that Toyota or Lexus vehicles have any more frequent SUA incidents than other car makes. Carol Mathews owned a 2002 Lexus ES300 that malfunctioned and accelerated multiple times, and she also petitioned the NHTSA to investigate Lexus vehicles. This time an investigation was opened, but was closed within 4 months, citing a lack of evidence of a defect. Meanwhile, Toyota had been updating its service bulletins to warn its dealerships about a surging issue seemingly unrelated to the SUA incidents, and also changed the shape of their 2004 Sienna trim panels, problems with which had occasionally resulted in an unintended acceleration incident. Toyota at this time also denied that any defects existed, and that the electronic control systm "cannot fail in ways its engineers have not already perceived." Many other petitions were made to investigate the issue, but few of them had any effect at all.
Back to Top 

2. Petitions and Investigations:

NHTSA Petitions and Investigations
The following are a list of the petitions presented to the NHTSA to investigate unintended acceleration, and the status of each of those petitions and investigations.
The NHTSA Action Number which acts as a name for each defect investigation is given a prefix to notate what stage of investigation the file is in.
  • DP or RP: Defect Petition or Recall Petition - A petition has been filed to launch an investigation into a defective car.
  • PE: Preliminary Evaluation - Reports of consumer complaints suggest that a defect exists and the NHTSA needs to find out more.
  • EA: Engineering Analysis - If further examination of a safety defect is warranted, a EA determines if a recall should be made.
  • RQ: Recall Query - The NHTSA determines that a vehicle must be recalled and sets the scope of the recall.



Click to expand any investigation to see the summary  

Name: DP03-003Type: Defect Petition
Name: DP04-003Type: Defect Petition
Name: PE04-021Type: Investigation: Preliminary Evaluation
Name: DP05-002Type: Defect Petition
Name: DP06-003Type: Defect Petition
Name: PE07-016Type: Investigation: Preliminary Evaluation
Name: EA07-010Type: Investigation: Engineering Analysis
Name: DP08-001Type: Defect Petition
Name: PE08-025Type: Investigation - Preliminary Evaluation
Name: EA08-014Type: Investigation - Engineering Analysis
Name: RQ10-003Type: Investigation - Recall Query


Despite many investigations into factors that were causing unintended acceleration, the NHTSA was unable to find evidence of car components contributing to unintended acceleration until 2007, and a large scale recall of cars was issued from 2009-2011. Despite an investigation into the Toyota Unintended Acceleration problem by NASA, there were still no findings of any electronic defects in the Toyota vehicles, and it began to look like pedal entrapment by floor mats and panel trim was the main culprit of sudden unintended acceleration incidents.
Back to Top 

3. Floor Mat Recalls:

One of the first major Toyota recalls of this period was not prompted by an investigation, but ended up setting the stage for more recalls to come. This was recall 6LD-60F, involving the 2004-2005 Lexus RX330s and the 2006 RX400H, as well as the 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander - approximately 367,000 units overall. This recall was filed on July 24, 2006, and was intended to replace 2 retaining clips that kept the drivers side carpet cover in place, which could come loose and interfere with the gas pedal. It is worth noting that this recall was found by Toyota and dealt with it on their own accord.

The Saylor Accident

For a few years, there was relatively little discussion over SUA. Incidents still happened sporatically and defect petitions were made to investigate other Toyota cars, but for the most part all was quiet. This changed on August 28, 2009, when a catastrophic crash would bring the issue of unintended acceleration back into the spotlight. The most prominent included CHP officer Mark Saylor and his family, in a 2009 Lexus ES350. Saylor and his wife, daughter, and brother-in-law had begun speeding out of control in Southern California, and had called 911 for help. On the recorded call, which went viral on TV news and the internet, you can hear the caller saying that the brakes did not work and that they were in trouble. The call ends with a scream as the car crashes off an embankment, killing everyone inside the car. Investigators would later find that the car, which was a loaner from a dealership, had been driven earlier in the week and had the same problem. The driver, Frank Bernard, had accelerated to get in front of a truck that was merging onto the freeway, and when he took his foot off the accelerator, the car kept going on its own, a speed of 80-85mph. Bernard said that he was able to use the brakes to slow to 50-60 MPH, but that he had to put the car in neutral to get it to slow any more than that. After he guided the car to the side of the road, he saw that the accelerator pedal had become wedged into the floor mat below. Bernard mentioned this problem to the receptionist at the dealership, but no action was taken.

The Recall Scramble

This accident and the frequency of other similar accidents sparked a scramble with Toyota to make sure that problems with all-weather mats were fixed. The recall 07E-082 was filed on September 26th, 2009, and recalled 2007-2008 Camrys and 2007-2008 ES350s for their all-weather mats that had the potential to block the accelerator pedal from returning to its' fully closed position. In their disclosure letter to the NHTSA, Toyota adamantly writes that neither the vehicles nor the all-weather mats "contain a safety-related defect," but that they would conduct a "voluntary safety campaign to replace all of the aforementioned [all-weather floor mats] with a redesigned one."
More floor mat and pedal entrapment recalls followed, including 09V-388 on December 31, 2009, and 10V-017 on February 5, 2010, which dealt with the possibility of condensation interfering with pedal operations and leading to a stuck gas pedal. These two recalls along with 10V-023 on March 30, 2010, recalled a total of about 8 million vehicles. Another estimated 2 million vehicles were recalled at the completion of recall query RQ10-003, which required 3 more recalls 11V-112, 11V-113, and 11V-115.

The Root Cause

At this point, Toyota alleged that the root cause of sudden acceleration was dealt with, in an attempt to save the company's reputation and to gain back any trust that they had lost from their customers. This would later be considered to be misleading the public with false information, as Toyota had made plans to provide for a minimum clearance of 10 millimeters between the all-weather mats and a fully depressed gas pedal, but had not implemented those plans and had still produced cars with a dangerous potential for the gas pedal to get stuck on the mats. Toyota had also not recalled all of the vehicles that had similar design features to the ones recalled for floor mat entrapment, namely the Corolla, the Highlander, and the Venza.
Back to Top 

4. The Truth Comes Out:

In 2010, freelance translator Betsy Benjaminson was assigned to review and translate 1,500 documents from Toyota regarding SUA, when she found that Toyota was hiding information regarding car defects, and even lying about it to the NHTSA regulators and the United States Congress. In 2013, Benjaminson released a personal statement on her facebook page, claiming that she found documents with evidence that "Toyota's press releases [were] bland reassurances obviously meant to help maintain public belief in the safety of Toyota’s cars—despite providing no evidence to support those reassurances." In addition to this, Benjaminson stated that "Toyota’s engineers... were searching for UA’s root causes, but they could not seem to find them", and that they would sometimes admit that the root cause "was the electronic parts, the engine computer, the software, or interference by radio waves." This evidence directly contradicted the statements that Toyota made saying that ther was no defect in the electronic throttle control system (ETCS).Benjaminson's complete personal statement was released in April 2013, and can be found here.
Benjaminson posted her personal statement when she decided to go public with her findings and name herself as the primary whistleblower behind the condemning Toyota internal documents. At the same time, David Hechler interviewed Benjaminson and wrote the article Lost in Translation, which reveals some of the contents of the leaked Toyota documents, including Toyota senior staff saying "I can't completely take care of the pedal problem." There was even a document that showed numerous errors found within the ETCS when testing, although they were assumed to have been errors that were corrected before production. Regardless, it gave proof that the ETCS could fail dramatically, despite Toyota engineers claiming that it wasn't possible.

A Flawed NASA Study

Hechler also wrote about a joint NHTSA and NASA study, which was created to test the ETCS but didn't find any evidence of a defect. The final report was delivered in February 2011, in which the Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Ray LaHood said, "The jury is back. The verdict is in. There is no electronic-based cause for unintended high-speed acceleration in Toyotas, period." This statement was widely reported and called for the public to start trusting Toyota again, as the report blamed most of the reported incidents of SUA on driver error. In reality, this test was not without its own set of problems. Hechler writes that "some of the scientists on this team wouldn't sign NASA's final report," due to the unusual nature of study - in which the team was told to ignore electronics failures that did not specifically match criteria set for them. The team was given 10 months to figure out "why certain cars had failed, but they were given no access to those that actually had." Thus, LaHood's blanketing statement of blessing for the ETCS did not sit right with many of the NASA scientists, who objected that NASA's final statement saying that there was "no evidence that a malfunction in electronics caused large unintended accelerations,” did not mean that there was no defects to be found.
The Barr Group, an independent company specializing in auto firmware, was hired to conduct another investigation for the Bookout v Toyota Motor Corp case, which was an unintended acceleration case that settled in late 2013. The result of the investigation was a 800-page document that claimed to find bugs in the Toyota ETCS that could lead to unintended acceleration. Michael Barr, founder of the Barr Group, noted that they "did a few things that NASA apparently did not have time to do," and that they "uncovered gaps and defects in the throttle fail safes." Barr went on to claim that there were many "mistakes in the Toyota analysis that NASA relied on," and that the cars' black boxes "can record false information about the drivers actions in the final seconds before a crash." The Bookout case settled for 3 million dollars in favor of Jean Bookout, who was injured, and the family of Barbara Schwarz, who was killed in the SUA crash.

Fees and Settlements

By The end of 2013, Toyota had paid billions of dollars for issues related to unintended acceleration.
  • In April 2010, the DOT issued a $16.4 million penalty against Toyota for hiding a sticky pedal problem in their cars and waiting 4 months to report it.
  • In December 2010, Toyota paid $32.4 million in civil penalties for the way it handled floor mat recalls and for not notifying the NHTSA about a steering defect.
  • In November 2012, Toyota paid $25.5 million to its shareholders who lost value in their stock due to Toyota's recalls.
  • In December 2012, Toyota again paid a $17.35 million fine for failing to report a safety defect in a timely manner.
  • At the same time, Toyota settled a class action lawsuit for $1.2-1.6 billion dollars. This suit was brought against them by Toyota drivers who felt that their car had lost value as a result of the recent UA problems.
In addition to the Bookout case, Toyota had by this time settled hundreds of personal injury cases having to do with SUA with confidential settlements, but the worst was not over yet.

A large price to pay

On March 19th, 2014, the Department of Justice levied a $1.2 billion financial penalty against Toyota for lying to NHTSA regulators and the US congress, and for willfully misleading the US public about the status of their cars and the Unintended Acceleration problem. Toyota was given such a high penalty because they had claimed that the root cause of sudden acceleration was dealt with, but had knowingly not recalled all of the cars that had the defect. In addition, just weeks before this statement, Toyota had "taken steps to hide from NHTSA another type of unintended acceleration in its vehicles... a problem with accelerators getting stuck at partially depressed levels," according to a statement by the DOJ. This landmark fine was the largest of its kind to be imposed on an automotive company. Preet Bharara, one of the US attorneys assessing the fine, commented that "the entire auto industry should take notice", as "Toyota stands charged with a criminal offense because it cared more about savings than safety and more about its own brand and bottom line than the truth."
Back to Top 

5. SUA Today:

Sudden Acceleration today is still an issue. In late 2014, another defect petition was submitted to the NHTSA to investigate low speed surging in Toyota Corollas, but the petition was denied. No further studies have been conducted into potential errors in the ETCS that have turned up any more evidence to prove that unintended acceleration can be an electronic issue. However, there are many that still think it is a big problem. Betsy Benjaminson still maintains a blog about Toyota's potential defects and you can read her thoughts there. Hopefully after billions of dollars in fines, Toyota has learned its' lesson and is ready to gain its' customers' trust back. If you or someone you know has been involved in a sudden unintended acceleration accident, give Bisnar Chase a call! We've taken the fight to automakers before and we have the experience and resources to fight for those who cant fight for themselves.

Have more to add?

Did you find any incorrect information? Do you want this article to expand on a specific subject, or do you have information to add? Use our contact form to contact us!
Back to Top 

 Have a question that wasn't answered here?

CALL US!
(800) 561-4887
Fill out our
Contact Form

Was This Page Helpful? Yes | No



http://www.bestattorney.com/auto-defects/sudden-unintended-acceleration/toyota-sudden-unintended-acceleration.html