Complaint Review: Anti Slapp laws, why we need it. NOTICE to all consumers. Junk lawsuits targeting free speech are a major threat to the First Amendment to chill consumers first amendment right to speak out. Lisa Borodkin.
Anti Slapp laws, why we need it. NOTICE to all consumers. Junk lawsuits targeting free speech are a major threat to the First Amendment to chill consumers first amendment right to speak out. Have you been sued for speaking out? Are you afraid of being bullied with a sham lawsuit over something you said? There is a new movement to stop dishonest plaintiffs and their attorneys by preventing and punishing Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. Help Ripoff Report stop junk lawsuits from destroying small businesses and shutting down freedom of speech on the Internet Washington, DC District of Columbia *California attorney Lisa Borodkin Sued for frivolous lawsuit
When I posted that Route 44 Toyota ILLEGALLY accessed my credit report as well as that of a friend whose name is NOT attached to the LEMON Toyota they sold me, they threatened a SLAPP Suit.
The intent of THREATENING is to BULLY, INTIMIDATE and SILENCE.
Route 44 Toyota had previously threatened that charge $25 per day for storage of the NEW LEMON Toyota left on their property with unpredictable behavior...specifically NO BRAKES.
There have been numerous other threats as well.
Route 44 Toyota continued to harass me after they were notified that a lawsuit had been filed.
Even though I have not communicated with Route 44 Toyota, their attorney, like a petulant child, recently made the accusation to a judge that I harassed Route 44 Toyota. How outlandish!
The solution is SIMPLE: Settle the Matter!
We all know they won't do that because M.G.L. 93B makes Toyota U.S.A. [a deep-pocketed client] fully responsible for the legal fees of Route 44 Toyota.....except for the FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act] violations --- illegally requesting credit reports.
