Betsy Spills Toyota’s Beans
To
steal a line from Bogie: “Of all the publications in all the websites in all the
world, she walks into Corporate Counsel.” She – being Betsy
Benjaminson, a freelance translator from Israel who was tasked with translating
from Japanese into English documents regarding Toyota Unintended Acceleration.
Corporate Counsel — being the self-described “leading digital
destination for in-house counsel to find breaking news and practical
information.” And this bit of breaking news? When you lie to the world about an
automotive electronics problem that has the potential to result in fatal
crashes, don’t expect every underling to keep your
secrets.
The story, entitled Is Toyota Telling the Truth About Sudden Acceleration? (Spoiler alert: the answer is: No.) is a fascinating behind-the-scenes look at a company in disarray with a technically challenging problem that its technicians weren’t looking too hard to solve, while its legal and public relations gears clicked into place to drive the denial machine forward.
Our favorite:
Benjaminson
was apparently so disturbed by the unvarnished emails she was translating, cast
against Toyota’s public assurances, she leaked them. According to this story,
some of the NASA scientists who worked on the February 2011 report that DOT
Secretary Ray LaHood proclaimed an exoneration of Toyota electronics were so
disturbed by the way they were forced to “investigate,” they refused to sign the
final product.
This story is well worth your time. It’s not likely to aid digestion for any in-house counsel reading it over his or her cornflakes, but for those of us who have been challenging the narrative put forth by the auto industry and its enablers – NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation – that unintended acceleration is always detected by the vehicle electronics, and that the absence of this evidence is ironclad proof that the problem was a driver or a floormat, it’s got the unmistakable ring of truth.
More on Toyota Unintended Acceleration
http://www.safetyresearch.net/2013/03/14/betsy-spills-toyotas-beans/
The story, entitled Is Toyota Telling the Truth About Sudden Acceleration? (Spoiler alert: the answer is: No.) is a fascinating behind-the-scenes look at a company in disarray with a technically challenging problem that its technicians weren’t looking too hard to solve, while its legal and public relations gears clicked into place to drive the denial machine forward.
Our favorite:
“Hagiwara and Chris Tinto,
a V.P. for technical and regulatory affairs and safety, had been talking about
the U.S. investigation and an earlier one in Europe that also involved
unintended acceleration (UA).
‘Tinto is extremely
pessimistic,’ Hagiwara wrote, ‘and is saying (public hearings, someone will go
to jail, I can’t completely take care of the pedal problem, etc.).’ Tinto’s
primary concerns (according to Hagiwara): ‘For NHTSA, we said that our
investigations in Europe found that the pedal return is a little slow at a
slightly open position, and that there were no accidents, but this is not true.
Last year’s situation in Europe (many reports of sticking pedals and accidents,
and a TI TS9-161 was filed on October 1, 2009) was not reported to NHTSA.’ That
failure, Tinto said, ‘may be a violation of the TREAD Act’—the federal law that
requires car manufacturers that conduct recalls in foreign countries to report
these to U.S. regulators.”
This story is well worth your time. It’s not likely to aid digestion for any in-house counsel reading it over his or her cornflakes, but for those of us who have been challenging the narrative put forth by the auto industry and its enablers – NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation – that unintended acceleration is always detected by the vehicle electronics, and that the absence of this evidence is ironclad proof that the problem was a driver or a floormat, it’s got the unmistakable ring of truth.
More on Toyota Unintended Acceleration
http://www.safetyresearch.net/2013/03/14/betsy-spills-toyotas-beans/
