THE LEMON LADY has NEVER been accused of not speaking clearly, not articulating her words as if she has a mouth filled with dog biscuits......
In MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA's deposition instructions, MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA instructed the LEMON LADY to ask for clarification if a question was unclear.
WELL.....shouldn't the same hold true for MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA [WHATEVER]?
MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA [WHATEVER] gets to that part about maybe there was some stuff in the Boston Land Court that involved the LEMON LADY.
What's it in reference to????
LEMON LADY offers TIMBER TRESPASS [M.G.L. statute below] since MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA [WHATEVER]'s dog ate his homework....
MR. ALBANY TOYOTA [WHATEVER] asks the LEMON LADY about TIMBER TRUST PASS because MR. ALBANY TOYOTA [WHATEVER] apparently can't HEAR clearly in addition to his previously itemized memory problems.....
THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH MASSACHUSETTS RECIPROCITY! [another issue]...remember when MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA argued with a judge because MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA screwed up?
...maybe it was because THE JUDGE was FEMALE...ya think he has a problem with women in addition to his other emotional problems?.....
POSTED HERE: Will Toyota U.S.A. Notice????
MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA [WHATEVER] throws his well-controlled hissy fit...
....when the LEMON LADY corrects MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA [WHATEVER] because he never listens.....
...MR. ALBANY ROUTE 44 TOYOTA insists the LEMON LADY should interpret the statute.....
....isn't that what attorneys go to law school for? Isn't that what they get paid for? .....
Massachusetts General Law Chapter 242 Section 7
Section 7. A person who without license willfully cuts down, carries away, girdles or otherwise destroys trees, timber, wood or underwood on the land of another shall be liable to the owner in tort for three times the amount of the damages assessed therefor; but if it is found that the defendant had good reason to believe that the land on which the trespass was committed was his own or that he was otherwise lawfully authorized to do the acts complained of, he shall be liable for single damages only.
You see this has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BRAND NEW ROUTE 44 TOYOTA THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS LAWSUIT!
IN MY OPINION!
